
Trans News > Articles > "Beijing + 10"
「北京+10」(「国連女性の地位委員会」閣僚級会合)関連記事アーカイブ
updated 2005/04/28
国際女性の地位協会 (Japanese Association of International Women's Rights)
日本国憲法第十四条第一項 すべて国民は、法の下に平等であつて、人種、信条、性別、社会的身分又は門地により、政治的、経済的又は社会的関係において、差別されない。
同法第二十四条 婚姻は、両性の合意のみに基いて成立し、夫婦が同等の権利を有することを基本として、相互の協力により、維持されなければならない。
配偶者の選択、財産権、相続、住居の選定、離婚並びに婚姻及び家族に関するその他の事項に関しては、法律は、個人の尊厳と両性の本質的平等に立脚して、制定されなければならない。
(解釈の基準)
民法第二条 この法律は、個人の尊厳と両性の本質的平等を旨として、解釈しなければならない。
(婚姻適齢)
同法第七百三十一条 男は、十八歳に、女は、十六歳にならなければ、婚姻をすることができない。
(再婚禁止期間)
同法第七百三十三条 女は、前婚の解消又は取消しの日から六箇月を経過した後でなければ、再婚をすることができない。
2 女が前婚の解消又は取消しの前から懐胎していた場合には、その出産の日から、前項の規定を適用しない。
正しい理解広めて 目黒上智大教授が報告 「北京+10」受け意見交換
(公明新聞 2005/04/28)
(写真)目黒教授(中央)から報告を受けた党女性委の会合
公明党女性委員会(委員長=浜四津敏子代表代行)は27日、参院議員会館で、今年(2005年)2月末から3月上旬にかけて国連本部で開催された第49回国連婦人の地位委員会(通称「北京+10」)について、国連婦人の地位委員会日本代表の目黒依子・上智大学教授から報告を受け、意見交換した。
目黒教授は「北京+10」について、男女平等と女性のエンパワーメント(能力開発や権利の付与)を目指す1995年の北京会議、続く2000年の国連特別総会(北京+5)の合意文書が「十分実施されていない」ことを受け、さらなる推進を確認したと報告。
また、男女共同参画の流れに逆行する「バックラッシュ」の動きについて目黒教授は、「ジェンダー(社会的に形成される男女の差異)とは何か知らない人が多いため放任されている。『男女の差異を否定する』といった誤解を解くため、本来の意味を正しく伝えることが大切」と強調した。
浜四津代表代行は、「性による不当な差別をなくすことは、人間らしい社会への第一歩。具体的に実践し、息長く、力を合わせて取り組みたい」と述べた。
男女平等めざす「北京行動綱領」 完全実施すみやかに 国連女性の地位委員会
新日本婦人の会中央本部国際部部長 平野恵美子さんのリポート
(しんぶん赤旗 2005/04/05)
(写真)平野恵美子さん
第四回世界女性会議(一九九五年、北京会議)から十年間のとりくみを評価・検討する第四十九回国連女性の地位委員会(CSW)閣僚級会合がこのほどニューヨークの国連本部で開かれました。百六十五カ国から約千八百人の政府代表団と、二千六百人余のNGO(非政府組織)代表が参加。新日本婦人の会を代表して参加した平野恵美子さん(新婦人国際部部長)のリポートを紹介します。
「世界の女性は監視している」
はねのけた「政治宣言」への米国の圧力
実施を約束する「政治宣言」採択
今回会合では、第四回世界女性会議で採択した北京行動綱領とそのさらなる実施を合意した二〇〇〇年国連女性特別総会の成果文書を、各国政府が再確認し「完全かつすみやかな実施」を約束する「政治宣言」を採択しました。
「政治宣言」をめぐって中絶反対を公言するアメリカは、「(北京行動綱領は)中絶の権利を含まないことを再確認する」という文言を挿入せよという修正案を提出。会期(二月二十八日〜三月十一日)の前半は、これを許すかどうかが焦点になりました。
(写真)NGOの打ち合わせ
キリスト教右派の“NGO”も動員してアメリカは各国政府に圧力をかけました。私たちNGOは「世界の女性は監視している、北京行動綱領の再確認を」とステッカーを胸に張るなどして反対しました。
結局、圧力をかけられたイスラム諸国や保守的な国々も同調せず、アメリカは修正案を撤回しました。性の自己決定権を含むリプロダクティブ・ヘルス・ライツ(性と生殖にかかわる健康と権利)の立場が、男女平等の推進、ひいては国の発展にとって欠かせないとの認識が広がっていることを実感しました。
九条を守る運動などで交流深め
(写真)行動綱領の実施求め、約叙助助人の女性が国連ビル前で行動=3月4日
NGOは二百近くのワークショップ(分科会)で、経験交流や問題提起を行いました。地域や分野ごとにコーカスとよばれる活動グループを作り声明を発表したり、政府にはたらきかけたりしました。
私は平和関連のワークショップに参加し、憲法九条を守る運動や被爆六十年のとりくみを紹介しました。また「平和をめざすカナダ女性の声」という団体の女性たちと、戦争のない世界をつくるために何をすべきかについて話し合いました。「カナダ女性の声」は核兵器廃絶にも積極的にとりくんでいます。トロントの市長が「広島・長崎市長の緊急アピール」に賛同、五月のNPT(核不拡散条約)再検討会議への行動にも参加の意向だそうです。
CSWに参加するNGOの活動をサポートしているニューヨークの「NGO・女性の地位委員会」はNGO世界リポートを作成しました。これに新婦人のリポートから何カ所も引用・掲載されました。
男女平等問題でのバックラッシュ(揺り戻し)、「男女平等」を口実にした税制や社会保障制度の改悪問題、男女共同参画基本法や自治体の条例制定はすすんだが予算や人員配置が不十分なことなどです。
平和の分野では、CSWへの日本政府の報告書が核兵器廃絶にまったくふれていないこと、日本政府が米ミサイル防衛計画に参加し、憲法九条を変えようとしていることなどです。
私たちが重要だと考えていることが、国際的にも注目されているといえます。
実施の“コップ”完全に満たそう
「(北京会議から)十年、北京宣言と北京行動綱領の実施はコップを完全に満たしたというには、ほど遠い状況です。次回委員会が検討を行うときには、確実にコップがいっぱいになったといえなければなりません」。CSWの閉会にあたり、カン・キョンファ議長は各国政府の責任を強調しました。
日本女性の政治や経済への進出度は七十カ国中四十四位(国連開発計画)。各分野で要求にもとづく共同をすすめながら政府に具体的な政策を迫る運動がいっそう大切になっています。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
北京行動綱領 一九九五年に北京で開催された第四回世界女性会議で採択した文書。「女性と男性の平等は人権問題で、社会正義への条件」などとのべ、女性と貧困、教育、健康、暴力、経済、人権など十二の重大関心領域の戦略目標と行動を提起。女性への暴力根絶や男女同一賃金、政策決定機関への平等な参加などを打ち出しています。
女性の10年 振り返る 国連女性の地位委員会 就学・就職前進/エイズ深刻 中絶で横やりの米に批判
(しんぶん赤旗 2005/03/28)
(写真)国際女性デーでニューヨーク市内をデモ行進する人たち=8日(山崎伸治撮影)
一九九五年に北京で開催された第四回世界女性会議から十年。第四十九回「女性の地位委員会」(CSW)閣僚級会合が二月二十八日から三月十一日までの二週間、ニューヨークの国連本部で開かれました。
今回の会合の主要目的は、北京会議で採択された北京行動綱領の実施状況を検証し、課題を明らかにすることでした。百六十五の国連加盟国から約八十人の閣僚、千八百人の政府代表、七人のファーストレディー、二千六百人以上の非政府組織(NGO)の代表が参加しました。
各国の代表は、この十年間で前進した点として、女性の就学率や就職率、政治参加の増加、性差別的な法律の改定などを挙げました。
深刻な課題も明らかになりました。国連「女性の地位向上部」のハナン部長は、女性に対する暴力の拡大、HIV・エイズにかかる女性の増加、性と生殖に関する健康と権利の欠如、雇用の不平等などを指摘。多くの分野で男女平等がいまだに実現されていないと強調しました。
■政治宣言
四日には、この会合の主要な合意文書である政治宣言が採択されました。宣言は五項目からなり、十年前の北京宣言と行動綱領を再確認する内容となっています。政治宣言の第二項目は「男女平等の実現に向けてこれまでに達成された前進を歓迎する」と同時に、北京宣言と行動綱領を実施していく上でなお課題が残されていることを強調。それを完全かつ速やかに実施するためにさらなる行動をとると約束しています。
また、宣言の第四項目はこう強調しています。
「北京宣言と行動綱領を実施し、女子差別撤廃条約に基づく義務を果たすことは、男女平等と女性のエンパワーメント(能力強化)の実現を相互に強化するものであることを認識する」
北京行動綱領は、中絶をどう扱うかはそれぞれの国内法手続きによるとし、違法な中絶については刑罰の軽減などの見直しを検討するよう各国政府に求めています。
■宗教右派
米国は政治宣言の採択前、北京行動綱領が「中絶の権利を含まないことを再確認する」とする修正案を提出。行動綱領の実行に弾みをつけることが緊急の課題だという一致が参加国間であるにもかかわらず、ブッシュ米政権に強い影響力を持つキリスト教右派の価値観を押し付けてきました。欧州各国やNGOは強く反発しました。
結局、米国は十分な賛同者を得られず修正案を撤回。政治宣言が採択されました。「会合はずっと前に合意された基準の細部の討議に時間を費やしすぎた。行動綱領は明快であり、隠れた意味など持っていない」―ニュージーランド政府代表は、会合に混乱をもたらした米国を正面から批判しました。
CSWを構成する四十五カ国は最終日の十一日、各国から出された十本の決議案を採択しました。これらの決議は国連の経済社会理事会に提出されます。
■広く修正
決議は、▽女性とHIV・エイズ▽津波など災害被災者の支援で女性への配慮▽女性と子どもの人身売買の根絶▽女性の経済的地位の向上▽パレスチナ女性への支援―など広い分野にわたっています。
米国は人身売買についての決議案を提出しました。各国から「性産業だけに対象が絞られている」「被害者の保護と人権の向上に目を向けるべきだ」との意見が出されました。その結果、より幅広い文言に修正の上、採択されました。
パレスチナ女性への支援に関する決議案は発展途上国からなる77カ国グループ(G77)と中国が提出。投票に付され賛成三十八、反対一(米国)、棄権二(カナダ、アイスランド)で採択されました。
CSWのカン・キョンファ議長は、「われわれは最後まであきらめないという強い決意を改めて固め合った。われわれは北京宣言と行動綱領を速やかに全面実施する責任を持つ」とCSWの成果を語っています。(中村美弥子)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
北京宣言と行動綱領 中国・北京で一九九五年に開催された第四回世界女性会議で採択された文書。行動綱領は女性の地位向上のためのガイドラインを示したもの。女性への暴力の根絶、経済的独立の促進、政策決定への平等な参加など十二項目の「重大関心領域」を盛り込んでいます。
女性会議を終えて 日本の課題 (読売 2005/03/24〜26 朝刊)
3: 見えにくいNGOの目標 (3/26)
2: 「国政参加」先進国で最低 (3/25)
1: 「10代の中絶」対策が必要 (3/24)
女性会議に米の逆風 「北京」から10年 成果検証に国連で会合
(朝日 2005/03/22朝刊オピニオン面)
北京の第4回国連世界女性会議から10年。北京で採択された行動綱領の成果を検証するため、国連本部で11日まで「第49回国連女性の地位委員会閣僚級会合(北京+10会議)」が開かれた。保守化する米ブッシュ政権が、中絶問題をめぐり女性の権利を低下させかねない提案をするなど会議は逆風にさらされた。各国の連携で現状維持は確保したものの、今後は女性会議以外の多様な場でも、理念を具体化していく地道な活動が求められる。
(竹信三恵子)
推進役、保守化で一転
「中絶の権利」反発強める
世界女性会議は国際婦人年(75年)の初回以降、5年か10年ごとに開かれてきた。だが、今回は毎年開かれる「女性の地位委員会(CSW)」拡大版という変則形をとった。背景には、米ブッシュ政権が基盤とする保守的キリスト教団体などの存在がある。
今回の会議が検証テーマに据えた北京行動綱領は、95年の北京女性会議で採択された。
貧困、教育など12の重要分野で包括的な戦略目標を掲げ、行動計画策定も各国に義務づけ、画期的な内容と評価されてきた。女性の健康の観点から、中絶の安全性を高めることや、中絶した女性を処罰する法律の見直しを検討するよう求める条項を含んでいる。当時の米クリントン政権も推進役を果たした。
米国の保守化は、中絶問題に象徴的に表れる。ブッシュ政権は中絶に触れた条項を「中絶を人権として認めかねない」と問題視。米国の動きを懸念した各国政府やNGO(非政府組織)には、今回の会議を「綱領を再確認する実務的なものに」との思いがあった。
予想通り米国は「綱領が中絶の権利を含まないことを再確認する」などの文言を入れ、今回の会議の政治宣言案を修正するよう冒頭から要求。議場外では「中絶権の除外を書かないと米国の主権が侵害される」と主張する修道士ら中絶反対グループがビラ配りやロビー活動を活発化させた。
一方、各国から集まった数千人のNGOメンバーらは「米政権が女性の会議を乗っ取った」と批判を継り広げた。
欧州連合(EU)各国は米国に強く反発し、南米諸国や日本も綱領を支持。結局、米国を最後まで明確に支持したのはバチカンだけで宣言は修正なく採択された。ただ、米国は「中絶椎は含まないと解釈する」と発言し、立場を貫いた。
アジアのある政府代表は「南米では、貧困や社会不安から中絶せざるを得ない女性が激増している。米国は実態を無視し、経済協力を材料に無理押ししていると受け取られ、逆に反発を買った」と指摘する。
米ニューヨーク・タイムズ紙も宣言採択の翌日、「男女平等推進で世界をリードすべき時に反中絶の熱狂に駆られ、各国閣僚やその他6千人の代表を疎外することを選んだ」と、ブッシュ政権の対応を酷評した。
女性の安全な中絶を目指すNGO「全米中絶連盟」(本部・ワシントン)によると、米国にはレイプや命の危険がある場合、低所得者向け公的医燎保険「メディケイド」から手術代などの補助が出るが、恣意(しい)的に支給されない例も増えているという。
保守的な土地柄のルイジアナ州の少女(13)はレイプで妊娠したが、州は支給を拒否。同連盟が他州での手術の資金を調達した。数年前には中絶クリニックへの放火なども相次ぎ、同連盟事務所も監視カメラつきの厳戒態勢をとる。ピッキー・サポルタ代表(51)は「人々のニーズと政策が大きくずれている」と、先行きを懸念する。
米政権の保守的な対応は性全般に及び、援助に頼る途上国には「性教育などへの補助が打ち切られれば、HIV(エイズ・ウイルス)がさらに広がりかねない」(フィリピンのNGO)との不安も広がる。
「北京綱領」具体化カギ
「米国を押し戻したことは大きな成果」。政治宣言採択後、NGOメンバーらはそう評価した。日本政府代表団の目黒依子・上智大教授は「イスラム諸国からの異論や南北対立など、従来の対立構造が今回は影をひそめた。北京綱領は10年かけて定着した」と話す。
女性会議の命脈が保たれたとも言えるが、カギは「定着した綱領」の具体化だ。
国際NGO「女性環境開発機構(WEDO)」は会期中、150カ国以上のNGOの回答をもとにまとめた報告書「裏切られた北京」を発表した。
それによると、この10年で、世界の男女平等の基礎といわれる「女性差別撤廃条約」の批准国は146カ国から179カ国になった。国連安全保障理事会も00年、紛争防止や平和構築に女性の役割が重要とする決議を採択。議会での女性議員増や職場での性差別禁止、男性が育児・介護へかかわることの促進などを求める法律がある国も増え、初等教育を受けられる少女も増えた。
枠組みは整ったが、米国は同撤廃条約をまだ批准しておらず、女性議員比率30%の目標を達成した国はまだ14カ国しかない。
報告書は「各国政府の政策は小出しで、北京で約束された女性の社会的、経済的、政治的な変化を起こすには足りない」と批判。その障害として、@01年9月の米同時多発テロ以降の軍事主義増大A女性の貧困を深刻化させる維済の新自由主義や市場主義B女性の自由を制限しようとする原理主義の横行――などを挙げる。
日本では女性会議への期待が高く、今回も「次の世界女性会議は開かれるのか」との質問が目立った。NGOとして出かけた団体職員矢口真琴さん(27)は「同世代が政府へ働きかけ、議場で発言するのを目の当たりにした」と、会議から得た教訓を話す。
国連婦人年を契機に女性会議がスタートして30年。会議は女性の地位向上を果たすため、世界の共通認識を醸成するなど重要な役割を果たしてきた。一方で、会議で掲げた理念をどう実現していくのかが問われる時期に入ってきた。
「政府が本気で行動しなければ、綱領はカラ約束になる」。米NGO「女性グローバル・リーダーシップセンター」のシャーロット・バンチ代表はこう指摘し、各国の予算措置を今年9月国連ミレニアム宣言に関する首脳会合で働きかけることや、国連改革の中での女性の発言力を強める組織づくりなどを呼びかける。
米国の保守化などで女性会議が揺れている今、会議以外の多様な場での活動の重要性が増している。そのことが、大国の思惑に左右されず会議を継続させ、より実りある枠組みに育てることにもつながるだろう。
| 経済政策・対テロも影響 ニューヨーク大教授(歴史学)リンダ・ゴードン氏 ブッシュ政権が中絶権の否定にこだわるのは、原理主義的キリスト教グループに代表される保守層が支持基盤だからだが、経済政策や対テロ戦争も影響している。 現政権の経済政策は富裕層重視。低所得層や労働者層は引きつけられない。そこで、中絶のように誰もがよくないイメージを持つ言葉を前面に出し、「こうした悪と戦う政権」といったモラルに訴えることで、金をかけずに支持を広げようという狙いだ。 ここ数年の事実上の戦時体制で、教育や福祉の予算は削減され、子育てや介護などを担わされがちな女性の負担感は増している。原理主義的な道徳観は女性の反発の声を抑え込む効果もある。 米国で注目すべきは、清掃などサービス産業で働く低賃金の移民女性の労働運動が活発化している点。こうした女性たちは現実の生活苦を克服せねばならず、黙ってはいられない。女性運動は中流階級のものとされてきたが、新たな担い手が政府に変化を促す原動力になる可能性はある。(談) |
女性会議30年の歩み
| 1975年 | 国際婦人年。メキシコで第1回世界女性会議。性別役割分業の変革を打ち出した「世界行動計画」を採択 |
| 80年 | 「国連婦人の10年」(76〜85年)の中間点として、コペンハーゲンで第2回世界女性会議。79年に国連で採択した「女性差別撤廃条約」の署名式が開かれ、日本も署名(批准は85年) |
| 85年 | ナイロビで第3回世界女性会議。女性の地位向上への障害を克服する国内措置を示唆した「ナイロビ将来戦略」を採択 |
| 95年 | 北京で第4国世界女性会議。「貧困」「女性への暴力」など12の重大関心領域について政府・NGOがとるべき行動を示した「北京行動綱領」採択。実施へ向けた国内行動計画を各国に義務づけ |
| 2000年 | ニューヨークで国連特別総会「女性2000年会議」。北京行動綱領実施のための行動とイニシアチブを盛りこんだ「成果文書」採択 |
| 05年 | ニューヨークで「女性の地位委員会(CSW)」を閣僚級会合に格上げした「北京+10会議」。北京行動綱領の再確認をうたった「政治宣言」採択 |
(写真)国連本部前で北京行動綱領の再確認を訴えて集会を開く女性たち=4日、米ニューヨークで
社説:女性の地位/「北京」から10年が過ぎて
(神戸新聞 2005/03/20朝刊)
この十年間、女性の人権を守り、地位を引き上げる取り組みは本当に進んだのか。
それを検証するための国連「女性の地位委員会」が、このほど、ニューヨークの国連本部で開かれた。
一九九五年に北京で開かれた第四回世界女性会議で、「女性の教育と訓練」「健康」「女性に対する暴力」など十二領域にわたる国際的な政策基準を示した「北京行動綱領」が採択されてから、ちょうど十年になる。このため、同委員会を「北京+10」という閣僚級会合に拡大し、各国から進ちょく状況の報告を求めて議論した。
約百カ国から政府代表やNGO(非政府組織)のメンバーら六千人近くが参加。今後も「北京行動綱領」を国際基準にすることが確認され、さらに、インド洋大津波の被災女性を支援することや、人身売買の撲滅など、十の緊急決議が採択された。
とはいえ、国際的な注目度は低かった。七五年のメキシコ会議以来、五年または十年ごとに開催されてきた世界女性会議に代わる会合としては、あまりに寂しい。
十年前の北京会議は、大規模なNGOフォーラムが同時に開かれたこともあって、世界各地から約四万七千人が集まった。阪神・淡路大震災が起きた年でもあり、兵庫県内からも、災害時の女性の惨状を訴えようと、多くの人が参加した。
中間年にあたる二〇〇〇年には、各国が行動綱領の実施状況を国連に報告したが、その際、日本でも、政府のリポートにNGOが対案をぶつけるなど、活発な議論があった。しかし、今年は、政府の発表についてほとんど議論がなかった。かといって、問題点や課題がないわけではない。
この十年、世界では貧富の差が広がり、紛争や災害も絶えない。その中で、女性に対する暴力や搾取、教育や就労の機会からの締め出しなどが、各地で起きている。
女性の地位向上は、人口爆発や環境破壊を食い止める有効な手立てである。国連ミレニアム開発目標の中でも明示されたこの認識を、隅々まで浸透させたい。
日本ではどうだろう。北京会議の後、「男女共同参画社会基本法」が制定され、内閣府内に担当部局もできた。DV(配偶者・恋人間の暴力)の防止法も施行され、一見、対策が進んだようにみえる。
しかし、女性の社会進出度を示す国際指標は、七十八カ国中三十八位と低迷している。DV被害者は増え続け、人身売買でも取り組み不足との批判を海外から受けた。
法制度ができたことに安心していてはいけない。息長い取り組みこそが大事だ。
EDITORIAL
A Misguided Anti-Vice Pledge (Los Angeles
Times 2005/03/20)
Social conservatives in Congress, backed
by the Catholic Church and the Christian
right, are on a new foray to dictate sexual
mores to the rest of the world, at the expense
of public health. This time it's an oath
being foisted on U.S. groups working to combat
the HIV/AIDS epidemic. They will soon be
asked to comply with a 2-year-old law dictating
that they have "a policy explicitly
opposing prostitution and sex trafficking"
before they will be considered for federal
grants to provide health services overseas.
The pledge is reminiscent of other Bush administration
efforts including the re-imposition of the
so-called global gag rule, which bans international
family planning groups that receive U.S.
funds from performing or even discussing
abortion. It is as unproductive as pushing
the United Nations to withdraw support for
needle-exchange programs. Such policies do
little to stem HIV, and contribute to the
deaths of women forced to seek illegal and
unsafe abortions.
AIDS experts agree almost uniformly that
the anti-prostitution pledge could have the
opposite of its intended effect, making it
tougher for aid groups to reach the women
who most need their help -- and who play
a major role in the spread of the disease.
The pledge has its origins in a law passed
by Congress in 2003 but not used as a litmus
test for funding until now. At stake is the
entire $3.2 billion the Bush administration
has asked Congress to set aside for global
efforts to curb AIDS and HIV next year.
It's absurd to suppose that any of the groups
working to combat HIV in the Third World
-- like Save the Children, Doctors Without
Borders and Oxfam -- are in favor of prostitution.
But a big part of fighting HIV/AIDS necessarily
involves working with prostitutes and building
trust so that they're willing to seek treatment
and counseling.
The pledge will not prevent groups from giving
condoms or antiretroviral drugs to prostitutes.
But it might stand in the way in other cases,
with highly damaging effects.
For instance, aid workers in Bangladesh sometimes
pass out shoes to brothel workers who are
forced by local custom to go barefoot. That
might not seem like a way to stem AIDS, but
it helps gain their trust and gives them
a measure of self-respect -- without which
they are unlikely to change their behavior.
Would these handouts, or counseling sessions
for sex workers on personal hygiene, be considered
a violation of the anti-prostitution pledge?
Its vague wording leaves that unclear. What
is apparent is that it could easily be used
to deny funding to groups that legislators
don't like.
Last year, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
(R-Tenn.) helped delay efforts to apply the
2003 law to U.S. groups working overseas.
This year he has stood on the sidelines.
Frist -- who regularly travels to Africa
to do pro bono work as a physician -- knows
the situation on the ground far better than
most of his colleagues. He should stand up
to his fellow conservatives and speak out
against the pledge. U.S. groups working overseas
should also refuse to sign it. These groups
fully understand why prostitution is a public
health disaster in the developing world.
They are working hard to give women better
options, not through coercion or moralizing,
but through venereal disease counseling,
domestic violence prevention, literacy programs,
job training and other social support. They
shouldn't be forced to prove their sincerity
by signing a pledge that could be used cavalierly
against them.
If conservatives want to go after prostitution
in the Third World, they can fund religious
groups to proselytize against it. Interfering
in the fight against HIV is a misguided policy
that could cost lives.
女性政策対立 米が強硬な中絶否定論 北京綱領の後退警戒を(解説)
(読売 2005/03/19朝刊)
国連の「婦人の地位委員会」閣僚級会合で、女性政策を巡る新たな対立の構図が浮かび上がった。(生活情報部・月野美帆子)
「米国からの修正要求が取り下げられたので、政治宣言の採択が出来ます」
会合が開幕して5日目の今月4日、冒頭に康京和(カンキョンファ)議長が発言すると、国連本部の本会議場は割れんばかりの拍手に包まれた。一方で、米政府代表団がぶぜんとして静まり返る様子は、新たな対立を象徴していた。
1か月ほど前から事前協議をしたにもかかわらず、政治宣言を巡り会議は紛糾した。原因は、米政府が開幕直前に提出した修正要求だった。
政治宣言は、1995年の第4回世界女性会議(北京会議)で採択された女性政策の国際基準「北京行動綱領」の内容を再確認し、実行を推進するなど、5項目を掲げたシンプルなもの。これに対し米国は、「北京綱領は中絶の権利を含まない」の文言を盛り込むことにこだわった。
米国の主張は、北京会議で獲得した「性と生殖の権利」に密接に絡んでいる。子どもをいつ何人産むか、または産まないか、について女性自らが決定権を持つという内容で、女性の地位向上を目指す上で欠かせない権利といえる。
だがブッシュ政権の支持基盤でもあるキリスト教右派は、「中絶は殺人」として、この権利に否定的な立場をとる。本会議と並行して開かれた同グループの集会では、「女性の権利拡大運動が家族を解体し、社会を混乱させた」など、過激な論調も目立った。
米国の行動に対し、ルクセンブルクの政府代表が「EU(欧州連合)は原案通りの採択を強く支持する」と発言するなど、反対姿勢を鮮明にする政府が相次いだ。
北京会議の際の米国はクリントン政権で、女性政策で世界をリードし、バチカン(ローマ法王庁)やイスラム諸国など伝統や宗教を重んじる勢力と対立した。それが今回は、米国と大半の参加各国との対立という構図に変わった。
米国は結局、採択予定日になって要求を取り下げた。エレン・ソーブレー米政府代表は「議長は米国の主張をわかってくれた」と述べたが、日本政府関係者は「米国案はほとんど支持されず、孤立していた。これ以上混乱させるのは得策でないと判断したのだろう」と分析する。
今回、米国という大国の要求だからこそ会議は1週間近く混乱し、「北京会議で合意された女性の権利を後退させかねない」という危機感が広まった。各国政府やNGO(民間活動団体)はかえって結束を強め、最終的には、北京綱領の内容を守るという一応の“成果”につながった。
とはいえ、対立が解消されたわけではない。日本をはじめ各国政府は、今後も、女性政策が後退することのないよう目を光らせる必要がある。
写真=米政府代表(左)に詰め寄るNGOメンバー(月野撮影)
女性の視点からの災害対策求めた決議採択 CSW閉会
(朝日 2005/03/12)
「北京+10会議」として米ニューヨークで開かれていた第49回国連女性の地位委員会(CSW)は、女性の視点からの災害対策を求めた「津波など災害復興」決議などを採択し、11日閉会した。各国から提案された10決議案はすべて採択された。
採択されたのは災害復興のほか、「女性とHIV/エイズ」「女性の経済的地位の向上」「国の政策への女性の視点の主流化」などの決議。
新しいテーマとして提案された「災害復興」決議は、女性と子どもの被害が大きかった昨年暮れのスマトラ沖地震がきっかけ。津波や災害後に起きがちな性暴力から女性を保護する措置、これらの暴力から女性を保護するシェルターの設置など、復興策に女性の視点が必要であることが盛りこまれた。
今回米国は、人身売買問題についての決議案を提案したが「性産業に対象が絞られ、被害女性の保護や強制労働にほとんどふれていない」などの不満が出て紛糾、より幅広い文言に修正されて採択された。
国連:女性の地位向上委員会 影落とす米保守主義
(毎日 2005/03/12朝刊)
国連本部で開かれた「女性の地位向上委員会(CSW)」閣僚級会合は、保守化が進む米国の影響を強く受けた会議となった。10年前の第4回世界女性会議(北京会議)で採択された北京行動綱領を再確認した政治宣言を採択し、11日に閉幕する。各国の代表団、国連幹部、NGO(非政府組織)が口をそろえて「後退しないことが前進」と話したこの会議とは、いったい何だったのか。【ニューヨーク國枝すみれ】
◇「中絶反対」拡大狙う−−NGO代表「振り子、右に振れた」
採択された政治宣言は紙1枚、5項目。それでも会議はもめた。
宣言採択の後、米国代表が「北京綱領が中絶など新たな女性の権利を認めたものではなく、性と生殖に関する女性の決定権に中絶する権利は含まれない、という国際理解が(今回の宣言で)できたと考える」と発言し、激しいブーイングを浴びた。
会議を傍聴していたメキシコのNGOメンバー、ニルバラ・ゴンサレスさんは「新しい人権を認めてこそ、人類は進歩するのに」と話した。議場の扉の外でも、約20人の女性が「原理主義に反対」と書かれた唇の形の紙マスクを付けて、米国に対する無言の抗議を行った。
ナイジェリアのベネット・マグナグさんは「世界は米国の脅しに屈しなかった。米国は再び孤立した」と採択を喜んだ。
宗教右派を支持基盤に持ち、妊娠中絶に反対するブッシュ政権は、2月中旬に始まった地位向上委員会の非公式会議から北京綱領の修正を要求し始めた。カタール、エジプトなど数カ国を除くすべての国が反対しているにもかかわらず、政治宣言が採択された4日朝まで、修正に固執した。
メディアの関心は米国代表団の動きに集中し、NGOからは「米国は会議をハイジャックした」「1週間も無駄にされた。ほかの重要な議論ができなかった」などの批判が続出した。
95年の北京会議では、女性の性や生殖に関する自己決定権を認め、「中絶した女性を罰すべきではない」という点で合意した。ところがその後、「振り子が右に振れ始めた」(メキシコのNGO)。
ブッシュ政権は、妊娠中絶反対の動きを世界に拡大することを狙っている。
北京会議から10年で15カ国が中絶手術を合法化したが、米国を含む5カ国は逆に規制を厳しくした。米国では、妊娠後期の中絶方法の一部を禁止する「部分出産中絶禁止法」が03年に成立。87%の郡で、中絶手術を施す病院が存在しない。ポーランドでも93年、中絶手術が事実上非合法化され、今では年に150件しか行われない。
スウェーデン代表団員は「原理主義的な宗教勢力が、女性の権利を押し戻そうとしている。今、重要なことは北京綱領を死守し、バックラッシュ(揺り戻し)に抵抗することだ。女性の地位向上は、2歩進んで1歩下がることの繰り返し。今年は1歩も後退しないことが、前進なのです」と説明した。
世界規模のバックラッシュが、北京会議以降、正式な女性会議が開かれなかった原因だ。アジア地区の代表団は「いま新たな政治綱領を作ったら、北京綱領よりも内容が後退する可能性があった」と打ち明けた。
◇マータイさんとメンチュウさん、団結呼びかける
ノーベル平和賞を受賞したケニア副環境相、ワンガリ・マータイさん(64)と、グアテマラの先住民族指導者、リゴベルタ・メンチュウさん(46)が4日、国連女性の地位向上委員会で演説した。2人は75年に初めてメキシコで国連の世界女性会議が開催されてから30年間の女性の権利運動を評価するとともに、差別や貧困を解決し、平和を維持するために、女性の団結と行動を呼びかけた。
マータイさんは、自身が創設した植林活動「グリーンベルト運動」が、メキシコの世界女性会議に向け、ケニアの女性たちが抱える問題を話し合う過程で生まれたと説明。「女性たちがこの30年間に成し遂げたことを祝いましょう。だが、やらなければならないことは、まだたくさんある。貧困と闘い、地球温暖化を防止し、森林破壊をやめさせることだ」と訴えた。さらに「女性にも男性と同等に能力を生かす場や機会が与えられるべきだということを政府に分からせなければならない。政策決定の場に女性が参加するのは、贈り物ではなく権利だ」と述べた。
一方、メンチュウさんは「女性は人種や性別による差別や排斥などの社会システムを変える希望の光とならなければならない」と述べた。さらに、「この30年間、国際的に声明や約束ごとがたくさんできた。あとは行動だ。女性たちが団結して前に進もう」と訴えた。マータイさんは昨年、メンチュウさんは92年にノーベル平和賞を受賞した。【ニューヨークで足立旬子】
◆北京会議から10年
◇差別的法律、なお多く−−自由市場化が貧困を加速
北京会議から10年たち、女性を取り巻く状況はどう変化したのか。国連の調査機関やNGOの報告によれば、就学率や就職率は伸びたが、逆に金、土地、権力からは遠ざけられた女性像が浮かび上がる。
NGO「イクオリティー・ナウ」が調査した45カ国のうち、北京綱領に従ってすべての差別的法律を撤廃した国はわずか13カ国。多くの国に差別的法律が残る。
例えば、ナイジェリアの刑法は、夫が妻を罰するために暴力を振るうことを許している。パキスタン法は、女性がレイプ被害を法廷で立証する場合、「4人のイスラム教信者の男性の証言が必要」と定める。同団体のジェシカ・ニューワース代表は「法律が不平等では差別を受けた女性を救済する手段がない」と批判する。
国連社会開発研究所(UNRISD)によると、国会議員に占める女性の割合は95年の平均約9%から約16%(今年2月発表)に上昇したが、北京会議で目標とした30%に届いた国はスウェーデン、ルワンダなど16カ国だけ。一方で、共産主義政権崩壊後の旧ソ連圏で女性議員が激減した。一定の議席を女性に割り当てる制度もなくなったためだ。
女性の労働市場への進出は増えたが、男性がフルタイム、女性がパートタイムで働く場合が多く、また同じフルタイムの場合でも、男女の賃金格差は拡大している。女性が所有している土地は全体の2%しかない。
同研究所のシャーラ・ラザビ主席研究員は「世界規模で進む市場の自由化、規制緩和は、予想されたほど経済成長に貢献していない。経済危機の発生や政府予算の削減につながり、貧しい女性がより困窮する原因となっている」と警告した。
アジアの通貨危機では女性が真っ先に解雇された。アフリカでは予算削減の結果、看護師、教師など公的サービスに従事する人口が激減し、貧しい女性がしわ寄せを受けている。
女性環境開発機構(WEDO)は今月、「裏切られた北京」と題した報告書を発行し、旧ソ連圏の女性や子どもが西欧諸国に移送され、強制的に売春などの労働につかされるケースが急増していると警告した。
◇「戦略立て直し急務」−−国連経済社会局・ハナン部長
国連経済社会局のキャロリン・ハナン女性の地位向上部長(57)は、女性の地位向上のため、世界は「戦略を立て直す必要がある」と強調した。
−−女性の地位向上委員会(CSW)で採択した政治宣言は10年前の北京行動綱領を再確認しただけ。今会議の意義は何ですか。
◆北京綱領は女性への差別を解消する上で素晴らしい青写真だが、十分に実行されていない。新しい綱領が必要なのでなく、北京綱領の内容を再確認し、各国で実行に移すことが大切なのだ。CSWには閣僚80人、ファーストレディー7人、2500以上のNGOが参加した。北京綱領、ミレニアム開発目標、女性差別撤廃条約の実行推進への弾みをつける意義があった。
−−米国が反中絶アジェンダを導入しようとしました。
◆各国代表は「新しい問題を提起しない」という約束をしていた。1国に対してドアを開けたら、すべての国がドアを開けようとするだろう。
−−最も深刻な問題は何だと考えますか。
◆女性への暴力だ。全世界平均で、5人に1人の女性が一生涯のうちに未遂を含むレイプ被害に遭っている。紛争地では女性に対する暴力が、戦争の道具として行われている。また、政策決定過程への参加も遅れている。国会議員に占める女性の数は10年で9%から16%に上がっただけ。
−−何が女性の地位向上の障害になっているのか。
◆多くの国で性差別を禁じる法律や政策、女性省や女性局など行政組織は整備されたが、実行が伴っていない。原因は、資金不足と、官僚と国民の間に存在する女性に対するステレオタイプ的な見方だ。男性の態度を変えないと、女性への暴力や差別は終わらない。女性だけが性差別の問題に興味を持つという発想を打破しなくてはいけない。我々は戦略を練り直すべきだ。女性の活用がもたらす経済発展をもっと強調すべきだ。
◇拘束力ない北京綱領
国連の「女性の地位向上委員会(CSW)」は毎年、ニューヨークの国連本部で開催されているが、今年は95年の第4回女性会議(北京会議)から10年たつことを機に、各国から閣僚を招いてCSW閣僚級会合とした。「北京プラス10」とも呼ばれる。
北京会議では、189カ国が女性への暴力の根絶、教育への平等なアクセス、経済的独立の増進など12項目を含む北京行動綱領を採択した。その後、女性会議は開かれていない。
北京行動綱領も、今回の政治宣言も、国際条約でないため、採択国への法的拘束力はない。もちろん内容を実行しない国に対する罰則もない。そのため、今会議でも「北京行動綱領の実行を義務付けるため、新しいメカニズムの導入が必要」という意見が出た。
一方、国際条約である女性差別撤廃条約は拘束力があり、日本を含む179カ国が締結している。しかし、米国はまだ批准していない。
---
女性地位向上委:10の決議採択、閉幕 国連本部
(毎日 2005/03/12)
【ニューヨーク國枝すみれ】国連本部の「女性の地位向上委員会」は11日、10の決議を採択して閉幕した。
決議は、▽女性や子どもの人身売買の根絶▽女性に急増しているHIV感染の拡大防止▽パレスチナ女性とアフガニスタン女性への支援▽女性の経済機会の増大と所得格差の縮小−−など。津波被害者の支援対策にジェンダーの視点を導入するという決議も含まれている。
これらの決議は今後、国連の経済社会理事会に提出され採択される見込み。
婦人の地位委、人身売買の撲滅強化など採択し閉幕
(読売 2005/03/12)
【ニューヨーク=月野美帆子】ニューヨークの国連本部で開催されている「婦人の地位委員会」閣僚級会合は11日夕(日本時間12日)、被災地の女性に対する支援の充実、人身売買撲滅への取り組み強化、経済的地位向上など、女性をめぐる緊急課題10項目の決議を採択、閉幕した。
この決議をもとに各国政府は女性政策を進める。
決議では、インドネシア・スマトラ島沖地震など自然災害の被災地で性的虐待や暴力から女性を守るために、各国政府、国連機関、民間活動団体(NGO)が行動を起こすよう呼びかけ、また各国政府に、災害下の様々な施策の意思決定に女性を組み込むよう求めた。
国際的に大きな問題となっている人身売買については、犯罪であり、同時に人権侵害でもあるということを強調した。さらに観光業界やインターネットプロバイダーに、人身売買を誘発する幼児買春ツアーや性産業の宣伝などを撲滅するための協力を要請した。
人身売買をめぐっては、米国務省がまとめた2004年版「人権報告書」で、日本は「(管理売春を目的とした)女性や少女の人身売買が問題として依然残っている」と指摘されている。
決議ではそのほか、「国内政策や制度で男女平等を推し進める」「エイズ対策をさらに強力に進める」などの課題を挙げた。
米国が提案した「経済的な地位向上」の決議案をめぐっては、起業支援など先進国の女性に照準をあてた内容となったため、途上国の貧困層への対策についての記述が不十分であるとして、各国から修正要求が相次ぎ、最後まで調整が続いた。
今回の会議は、1995年の「第4回世界女性会議(北京会議)」で採択された女性政策の国際規範「北京行動綱領」以降の各国の取り組み状況を検証するとともに、同綱領に基づいて今後も女性政策を進めていくことを再確認することが目的。今月4日には同綱領の内容を再確認し、実行を推進する「政治宣言」が採択された。
日本政府代表団首席代表の西銘順志郎・内閣府大臣政務官は「北京行動綱領のさらなる実施に向けて行動とイニシアチブを明確にする」と表明している。
会議には、日本をはじめ、世界から約100か国の閣僚など政府代表のほか、NGOなど約6000人が参加した。
Countries adopt resolutions to press fight
for women's equality (AP 2005/03/12)
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The final day of a
meeting to press for women's equality took
an odd turn Friday when countries adopted
a resolution pushing for the economic advancement
of women _ over the objections of its chief
sponsor, the United States.
The resolution capped a contentious two week
meeting of the Commission on the Status of
Women that ended much as it began, with the
United States at odds with much of the rest
of the world on issues of reproductive health
and abortion.
The United States had originally intended
that the document on economic advancement
focus on entrepreneurship, but South Africa
proposed an amendment saying that "the
neglect of women's reproductive rights severely
limits their opportunities in public and
private life.''
A Cuban amendment on the downside of globalization
was also added.
Unhappy with those changes, the United States
withdrew its backing.
The vote went ahead anyway and the document
was adopted by consensus.
"There are some good things in there
so I think we have to take heart that we
did get some of our entrepreneurship language
... but it really is kind of the kitchen
sink right now,'' U.S. Ambassador Ellen Sauerbrey
said.
"It's the enabling environment that
we started with and so much additional that
it really lost any focus.''
There was also a minor embarrassment for
the Americans - Sauerbrey tried to withdraw
the document from consideration entirely
because of the changes, but did not realise
the rules prohibited her from doing so because
amendments had been made.
Nine other resolutions were passed Friday
without such fireworks, including documents
calling for more action to eliminate sex
trafficking and help women reverse the AIDS
pandemic.
The two-week gathering was to reaffirm the
platform for action adopted at the 1995 U.N.
women's conference in Beijing to achieve
equality for women.
While only 45 nations voted on the resolutions,
165 countries sent 1,800 delegates including
many ministers.
Some 2,600 representatives of human rights,
women's and other advocacy groups also attended.
Friday's debate was similar to one that had
raged the first week, the United States had
tried to amend a document reaffirming the
Beijing platform to say it did not create
any new human rights, including a global
right to abortion.
In the face of stiff opposition, Sauerbrey
had withdrawn that amendment after delegations
assured Washington the Beijing platform created
no such thing.
Kyung-wha Kang, head of the Commission on
the Status of Women which organized the meeting,
highlighted the "powerful'' declaration
adopted at the end of the first week.
She called it "an unqualified and unconditional
reaffirmation'' of the 150-page Beijing platform
and an accompanying declaration.
The declaration, which urges governments
to ensure the "full and accelerated
implementation'' of the two documents, was
eventually adopted by consensus.
An AIDS resolution passed Friday emphasizes
that "the advancement of women and girls
is key to reversing the pandemic'' and urged
governments "to take all necessary measures
to empower women and strengthen their economic
independence ... to enable them to protect
themselves from HIV infection.''
A text on trafficking demands governments
take measures to eliminate the demand for
trafficked women and girls "for all
forms of exploitation.''
It also asks nations to raise awareness of
the consequences of sex trafficking, including
its links to commercial sexual exploitation.
That was a victory for the United States,
which had wanted to make the link to prostitution
in the text.
Several women's advocacy groups praised the
outcome of the two-week conference and the
delegates' "united stance'' against
the efforts of President George W. Bush's
administration's, which they said were "intended
to play to domestic political audiences.''
"What we proved here is that the United
States can't bully the world when it comes
to women's human rights,'' said June Zeitlin,
executive director of the Women's Environment
and Development Organization.
"We must be vigilant about any future
attempts to roll back women's rights at home
and abroad.''
US challenged on reproductive rights (Reuters
2005/03/12)
A UN women's conference approved an American-drafted
resolution on economic equality that the
United States ended up opposing because of
an amendment on "reproductive rights".
"This amendment is not acceptable to
the United States," said US delegate
Ellen Sauerbrey on the final day of the two-week
meeting. "We worked very hard during
the course of negotiations to arrive at language
that was broad and was acceptable to most
delegations."
After Cuba successfully amended the resolution
with a reference to a possible negative impact
on women from globalisation, Ms Sauerbrey
offered to withdraw the text.
Advertisement:
But the 45-member Commission on the Status
of Women, which organised the conference,
approved the resolution today anyway, including
language from South Africa saying that the
"neglect of women's reproductive rights
severely limits their opportunities in public
and private life".
Ms Sauerbrey repeatedly stressed Washington's
opposition to abortion and sexual rights.
She also said that abstinence was "the
healthiest" and "most responsible
choice" for adolescents and parents
had the primary responsibility for sex education.
The two-week meeting was organised to review
advances and setbacks 10 years after a landmark
conference on women in Beijing, which broke
new ground on women's sexuality and agreed
on the need for access to family planning.
It did not advocate abortion.
While only 45 nations voted on resolutions,
165 countries sent 1800 delegates to the
session, including 80 ministers and 3000
advocates of women, human rights and health
groups.
Other resolutions included AIDS prevention,
the neglect of indigenous women, victims
of Asia's Tsunami and rights for Afghan and
Palestinian women.
A measure on trafficking and sex tourism,
also sponsored by the United States, had
to be modified to accommodate other delegations,
who favoured legal prostitution.
The AIDS resolution urged governments to
help women fight the pandemic "principally
through the provision of health care and
health services, including for sexual and
reproductive health and through preventive
education".
While many resolutions and debates did not
involve a conservative US stance, delegates
complained that going over old ground, particularly
on abortion, hindered the conference.
Kerry Flanagan, head of Australia's Office
for Women, said the proliferation of resolutions
preventing the meeting from being "relevant,
practical and forward looking" and turned
it into a "giant drafting committee".
Ms Sauerbrey has generally backed the Beijing
platform but used little of its wording in
statements and resolutions. While abortion
and contraceptives are legal in the United
States, government funding has been reduced
for family planning for the poor at home
and abroad.
"The US government is much more conservative
than the US public at large and right now
it is more conservative than most governments
in the world - not all, but most," said
Charlotte Bunch, director of the the Centre
for Women's Global Leadership at Rutgers
University in New Jersey.
Moreover, she said the UN Commission on the
Status of Women was understaffed and underfunded.
"This is not a high priority in the
UN system," Ms Bunch said.
The conservative Heritage Foundation said
the United Nations too often bowed to radical
feminists by putting more emphasis on "access
to sexual and reproductive health" services
rather than on a healthy family life, which
would help women overcome the ill effects
of poverty.
The problem at the UN is not national quotas
Ramesh Thakur (International Herald Tribune
2005/03/12)
Who runs the United Nations?
TOKYO It is sometimes said that there is
a human-resources crisis in the United Nations,
and that national quotas in making senior
appointments is one major cause. This is
a myth. Senior appointments at the United
Nations are more a mix of power and money
than quota politics.
.
The success of the pressure from governments
for their nominees to be appointed is directly
proportional to the location of the countries
in the international hierarchy of power and
wealth, and to a lesser extent to their numbers
in UN geographical groups.
.
The quota system serves as a scapegoat for
the failings of mainly Western senior managers.
Almost all the powerful and big-budget posts
in the UN Secretariat and in the broader
UN system are filled by Westerners, including
peacekeeping, political affairs, management,
development and environment programs, children's
fund, human rights and refugees.
.
Viewed from Asia, the top of the UN looks
decidedly Atlantic. A senior former Asian
ambassador to the UN commented at a regional
seminar last year that it was difficult for
Asians to connect with the UN when its senior
officials dealing with Asia were non-Asians.
Other ambassadors and ministers concurred.
.
Asians contribute about half the UN's total
peacekeepers and one-quarter of its regular
and peacekeeping budget (almost three-quarters
just from Japan). Asians have also suffered
about one-quarter of total UN peacekeeping
fatalities. Yet a year ago, there was not
a single Asian (and just one African) in
the senior ranks of the peacekeeping department.
Two-thirds of senior staff in the UN Department
of Peacekeeping Operations are Westerners.
.
In the UN Secretariat overall, Asians comprise
a mere 17 percent of senior UN staff at the
grades of director and above. Much attention
is focussed on promoting women to senior
posts, yet they fare better than Asians:
35 percent.
.
It is worth slaying another myth, that the
UN is top-heavy. Of 2,500 professional staff
in the Secretariat a year ago, 13 percent
were in the senior ranks. Of the senior staff,
almost one third are from the five permanent
members of the Security Council - the United
States, Russia, China, Britain and France.
Between them, Canada (9) and the United States
(47), which have 5 percent of the world's
population, have the same number of senior
staff in the Secretariat as all of Asia,
which accounts for 60 percent of the world's
people.
.
The underrepresentation of Asians in the
UN system is at best a curiosity that needs
an explanation and at worst a scandal reflecting
the fact that Asians are the least united
and cohesive of all the regional groups there.
.
Making a public fuss is alien to the Asian
way. But in the context of a culture of self-serving
and self-advancing arguments at the United
Nations, the result is a failure by Asian
government representatives to promote the
interests of their people. They should be
more assertive in proposing professionally
competent Asian names for suitable senior
posts, and then lobbying for them.
.
Maybe the United Nations has not been very
effective at rebutting charges against it.
Perhaps the organization needs to revamp
its grievance procedures so that genuine
whistle-blowers and victims are protected
from the wrath of vengeful or lecherous bosses,
managers are protected from mischievous charges
laid against them by disgruntled employees,
and staff as well as the world at large are
given prompt and satisfactory accounts of
action taken.
.
But whatever faults there may be at senior
levels of the UN, the blame for them does
not lie in quota appointments. They are not
the source of the problem; they might provide
a solution.
.
(Ramesh Thakur is senior vice rector of the
United Nations University in Tokyo. His new
book, ‘‘The United Nations and the Changing
Peace and Security Agenda,’’ will be published
by Cambridge University Press.)
.
See more of the world that matters - click
here for home delivery of the International
Herald Tribune.
.
Who runs the United Nations?
TOKYO It is sometimes said that there is
a human-resources crisis in the United Nations,
and that national quotas in making senior
appointments is one major cause. This is
a myth. Senior appointments at the United
Nations are more a mix of power and money
than quota politics.
.
The success of the pressure from governments
for their nominees to be appointed is directly
proportional to the location of the countries
in the international hierarchy of power and
wealth, and to a lesser extent to their numbers
in UN geographical groups.
.
The quota system serves as a scapegoat for
the failings of mainly Western senior managers.
Almost all the powerful and big-budget posts
in the UN Secretariat and in the broader
UN system are filled by Westerners, including
peacekeeping, political affairs, management,
development and environment programs, children's
fund, human rights and refugees.
.
Viewed from Asia, the top of the UN looks
decidedly Atlantic. A senior former Asian
ambassador to the UN commented at a regional
seminar last year that it was difficult for
Asians to connect with the UN when its senior
officials dealing with Asia were non-Asians.
Other ambassadors and ministers concurred.
.
Asians contribute about half the UN's total
peacekeepers and one-quarter of its regular
and peacekeeping budget (almost three-quarters
just from Japan). Asians have also suffered
about one-quarter of total UN peacekeeping
fatalities. Yet a year ago, there was not
a single Asian (and just one African) in
the senior ranks of the peacekeeping department.
Two-thirds of senior staff in the UN Department
of Peacekeeping Operations are Westerners.
.
In the UN Secretariat overall, Asians comprise
a mere 17 percent of senior UN staff at the
grades of director and above. Much attention
is focussed on promoting women to senior
posts, yet they fare better than Asians:
35 percent.
.
It is worth slaying another myth, that the
UN is top-heavy. Of 2,500 professional staff
in the Secretariat a year ago, 13 percent
were in the senior ranks. Of the senior staff,
almost one third are from the five permanent
members of the Security Council - the United
States, Russia, China, Britain and France.
Between them, Canada (9) and the United States
(47), which have 5 percent of the world's
population, have the same number of senior
staff in the Secretariat as all of Asia,
which accounts for 60 percent of the world's
people.
.
The underrepresentation of Asians in the
UN system is at best a curiosity that needs
an explanation and at worst a scandal reflecting
the fact that Asians are the least united
and cohesive of all the regional groups there.
.
Making a public fuss is alien to the Asian
way. But in the context of a culture of self-serving
and self-advancing arguments at the United
Nations, the result is a failure by Asian
government representatives to promote the
interests of their people. They should be
more assertive in proposing professionally
competent Asian names for suitable senior
posts, and then lobbying for them.
.
Maybe the United Nations has not been very
effective at rebutting charges against it.
Perhaps the organization needs to revamp
its grievance procedures so that genuine
whistle-blowers and victims are protected
from the wrath of vengeful or lecherous bosses,
managers are protected from mischievous charges
laid against them by disgruntled employees,
and staff as well as the world at large are
given prompt and satisfactory accounts of
action taken.
.
But whatever faults there may be at senior
levels of the UN, the blame for them does
not lie in quota appointments. They are not
the source of the problem; they might provide
a solution.
.
(Ramesh Thakur is senior vice rector of the
United Nations University in Tokyo. His new
book, ‘‘The United Nations and the Changing
Peace and Security Agenda,’’ will be published
by Cambridge University Press.)
UN report urges judicial reform for women
(Xinhua 2005/03/12)
www.chinaview.cn 2005-03-12 08:28:02
UNITED NATIONS, March 11 (Xinhuanet) -- War
breaks out in certain countries because of
a perception of a lack of justice by large
segments of the population and women feel
that burden of injustice even more keenly
than men both before and after the conflict,
saida UN report released on Friday.
The vulnerabilities of women are dramatically
increased during conflict and, more than
that, their rights are seriously violated,or
largely ignored, said the report, entitled
"Peace Needs Women and Women Need Justice."
The report, which has been submitted to the
Security Council, was prepared jointly by
the UN Fund for Women and a Stockholm-based
lawyers' group. It was based on results of
a three-day international conference on women
held in Stockholm last December.
The report called for the establishment of
a high-level mechanism to determine what
issues and recommendations raised at the
conference require follow-up action by the
UN system as a whole, as well as by its member
States, regional organizations, non-governmental
organizations and other relevant actors.
It urged joint action by the Security Council,
the General Assembly and the Economic and
Social Council to support the establishment
of that mechanism, which could then address
the needfor a "dedicated structure"
in the UN to coordinate assistance forjustice
systems, with an agreed methodology.
The Stockholm conference was attended by
women from such areas of pre-independence
or continuing conflict as Afghanistan, Burundi,the
Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Iraq,
Kosovo, Liberia, Namibia, Rwanda, Sierra
Leone, South Africa and Timor-Leste. Enditem
Reviewing Beijing documents on women’s rights,
UN commission calls for more action (United
Nations News Centre 2005/03/11)
11 March 2005 - Delegates to the United Nations
Commission on the Status of Women (CSW),
ending a two-week review of the implementation
of policies and plans produced by the last
major UN conference on women 10 years ago
in Beijing, today called on Governments to
take action to meet the remaining gaps and
challenges.
“Worldwide consensus has built around the
idea that empowering women is the most effective
tool for development and poverty reduction,
and that remaining obstacles to gender equality
can be overcome,” said Rachel Mayanja, Special
Adviser to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan
on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women
at the “Beijing+10” review.
Organizers from the UN Department for the
Advancement of Women (DAW) said Governmental
participants at the Commission’s 49th session
included about 80 cabinet ministers, more
than 1,800 delegates from 165 UN Member States
and seven First Ladies. Representatives from
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) numbered
2,600 of the 6,000 registered.
“Ten years after Beijing, this review called
attention to the many areas where women’s
equality is still not a reality ? continuing
high rates of violence against women in all
parts of the world including in armed conflict,
increasing incidence of HIV/AIDS among women,
gender inequality in employment, lack of
sexual and reproductive health rights and
a lack of equal access under the law to land
and property, to name a few,” DAW Director
Carolyn Hannan said.
Delegates exchanged experiences and ideas
on the struggle for equality. They ranged
from campaigning for greater participation
in making public policy, to organizing pro-woman
caucuses, to appointing high-level commissioners
to spotlight inequities and to forming inter-departmental
task forces. They also approved relevant
resolutions.
Roundtables discussed making data collection
and analysis more relevant, including in
assessing Millennium Development Goals (MDGs),
recognizing the impact of socio-economic
policies on women and implementing the Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women (CEDAW), commonly thought of
as a Bill of Rights for women.
At the end of the first week, delegates adopted
a declaration re-affirming the commitments
made in the Declaration and Plan of Action
issued by the Fourth World Conference on
Women in Beijing and urged governments to
facilitate the advancement of women.
“This concise and powerful declaration is
an unqualified and unconditional reaffirmation
of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for
Action and a pledge of further action for
full and accelerated implementation of Beijing,”
said CSW Chair Kyung-wha Kang of the Republic
of Korea.
Ms. Kang was charged with transmitting the
declaration, through the UN Economic and
Social Council (ECOSOC), to the 60th session
of the General Assembly, including the Assembly’s
high-level review of the Millennium Declaration
in September.
A high point of the CSW fortnight was a special
30th anniversary celebration of the First
World Conference on Women in Mexico City,
with messages from the UN Assistant Secretaries-General
who served as secretaries-general of that
and subsequent UN conferences on women.
The messages came from Helvi Sipila of Finland
(Mexico City, 1975), Lucille Mair of Jamaica
(Copenhagen, 1980), Leticia Shahani of the
Philippines (Nairobi, 1985) and Gertrude
Mongella of Tanzania (Beijing, 1995).
Governments pledge to accelerate efforts
to achieve gender equality
www.chinaview.cn 2005-03-12 04:30:48
UNITED NATIONS, March 11 (Xinhuanet) --
A two-week meeting to review progress made
since a major women's conference in Beijing
ten years ago concluded on Friday by underscoring
the need for governments to do more to achieve
gender equality and facilitate the advancement
of women.
A Declaration reaffirming the commitments
made ten years ago inBeijing and calling
for further action from governments was adopted
at the end of the first week. This was the
most significant outcome of the meeting,
which was held as part of the 49th session
of the Commission on the Status of Women
from Feb.28 to March 11 at UN Headquarters
in New York.
"This concise and powerful declaration
is an unqualified and unconditional reaffirmation
of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for
Action and a pledge of further action for
full and accelerated implementation of Beijing,"
said Kyung-wha Kang, Chairperson of the Commission
on the Status of Women.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said at the
opening that no other policy is as likely
to raise economic productivity, or to reduce
infant and maternal mortality, no other policy
is as sure to improve nutrition and promote
health, including the prevention of HIV/AIDS,
and no other policy is as powerful in increasing
the chances of education for the next generation.
"And I would also venture that no policy
is more important in preventing conflict,
or in achieving reconciliation after a conflict
has ended," he stressed.
Delegates at the high-level plenary session
detailed the progress that has been made
in the status of the world's women over the
last decade, including improvements in girls'
education, the economic advancement of women
and increased political participation, as
well as reforms to eliminate discriminatory
laws.
"Worldwide consensus has built around
the idea that empowering women is the most
effective tool for development and poverty
reduction, and that remaining obstacles to
gender equality can be overcome," said
Rachel Mayanja, Special Adviser to the Secretary-General
on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women.
The extraordinary level of participation
included approximately80 Ministers, over
1800 government delegates from 165 Member
States, seven First Ladies (from Burkina
Faso, the Dominican Republic, Mali, Mexico,
Panama, South Africa and Suriname), and more
than 2,600 nongovernmental representatives
from all regions of the world.
This level of attendance clearly signaled
the large amount of interest and high expectations
related to the ten-year review.
Delegates discussed best practices and shared
experiences and recommended innovative ways
of promoting gender equality that ranged
from appointing high-level commissioners
on gender issues and establishing interdepartmental
task forces, to organizing women's caucuses
and campaigns to encourage greater participation
in decision-making.
A series of round tables focused on such
areas as the Millennium Development Goals
and the Convention on the Eliminationof All
Forms of Discrimination against Women.
Other topics covered included upgrading data
collection and analysis and recognizing the
impact of economic policies on women.
"Ten years after Beijing, this review
called attention to the many areas where
women's equality is still not a reality -
continuing high rates of violence against
women in all parts of the world including
in armed conflict, increasing incidence of
HIV/AIDS among women, gender inequality in
employment, lack of sexual and reproductive
health rights and a lack of equal access
under the law to land and property, to name
a few," said Carolyn Hannan,Director
of the Division for the Advancement of Women.
A highlight of the meeting was an observance
on March 4 to celebrate 30 years since the
first world conference on women was held
in Mexico City. The tribute brought participants
to their feet as they applauded distinguished
speakers including Nobel laureates Rigoberta
Mench and Wangari Maathai and speeches presented
by former Secretaries-General of the four
World Conferences on Women.
Another key aspect of the meeting was the
quantity and diversity of parallel events
organized mainly by the nongovernmental community,
as well as by Member States and UN agencies.
On topics ranging from the plight of women
in Afghanistan, Iraq,the Sudan and other
conflict zones to women in post-tsunami reconstruction
efforts, youth and perceptions of gender
roles, inheritance rights, trafficking, and
women's health issues, including HIV/AIDS,
the events underlined the critical role of
civil society in efforts to bring about gender
equality. Enditem
RIGHTS:
World's Women Stand Together for Equality
Niko Kyriakou (Inter Press Service 2005/03/11)
UNITED NATIONS, Mar 11 (IPS) - The Fifth
World Conference on Women drew to a close
today with a reaffirmation by the 80 ministers,
1,800 government delegates, seven first ladies
and 2,600 non-governmental representatives
from around the world who attended that ”women's
rights are human rights”.
The two-week session reviewed progress on
gender equality over the past decade. Goals
for the advancement of women set 10 years
ago at the 1995 Fourth World Conference on
Women in Beijing were reaffirmed here in
a Declaration adopted at the end of the first
week.
”This concise and powerful declaration is
an unqualified and unconditional reaffirmation
of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for
Action and a pledge of further action for
full and accelerated implementation of Beijing,”
said Kyung-wha-Kang, chair of the Commission
on the Status of Women (CSW).
Commitments made in Beijing include the right
of women to control their sexuality free
from coercion, discrimination or violence,
and the application of international law
equally to men and women.
For many who attended the conference however,
”reaffirmation” was not enough.
”It is an important victory that governments
worldwide reaffirmed that 'women's rights
are human rights' as a central message of
the Beijing Platform for Action,” said Charlotte
Bunch, executive director of the Center for
Women's Global Leadership.
”But these commitments will only be empty
promises unless governments turn them into
concrete actions aimed at improving the daily
lives of women.”
In 2000, at a review meeting called Beijing
Plus Five, women demanded action on lagging
reforms and governments pledged to invest
more in medicines for epidemics, sex education
for adolescents, and in getting men and women
to practice safe sex.
Now, five years later, the Beijing platform
still hasn't been implemented, says June
Zeitlin, executive director of the Women's
Environment and Development Organisation
(WEDO).
”We've made some gains on the level of policy
and law but it hasn't translated into improvements
in women's lives,” she said.
WEDO has produced a report entitled, ”Beijing
Betrayed” which interviews women from some
150 countries. The core of the women's critique,
the report says, is that ”governments worldwide
have adopted a piecemeal and incremental
approach to implementation that cannot achieve
the economic, social and political transformation
underlying the promises and vision of Beijing.”
”Women came here to talk about implementation,”
Zeitlin says, ”yet we've been diverted again
and again by the narrow agenda of the United
States.”
During the first week of the conference,
the U.S. threatened not to reaffirm the Platform
of Action unless text was added saying that
the Platform provides no new international
human rights, including no right to abortion.
When all but Egypt and Qatar refused to support
the idea, the U.S. backed down and granted
its support for the Declaration. But not
before many hours of debate were lost.
”What we proved here is that the United
States can't bully the world when it comes
to women's human rights,” Zeitlin said.
”While we are pleased that the United States
ultimately rejoined the global consensus
on women's rights at this meeting, we will
continue to monitor their actions to implement
a women's human rights agenda.”
”We must be vigilant about any future attempts
to roll back women's rights at home and abroad,”
she added.
NGOs such as Equality Now and the Center
for Women's Global Leadership complained
that the deadlock over reproductive rights
prevented important issues from reaching
the ears of high-level government officials,
who were only in attendance the first week
of the conference.
Zeitlin suspects that U.S. delays were ”deliberate”
and says that the George W. Bush administration
seems to be against any international laws
relating to abortion. Because of hold-ups
in the meeting she said, a wider discussion
about why much of the Beijing platform hasn't
been implemented also never occurred.
Explanations, she says, range from changes
of conditions in countries to changes in
the global environment since 1995, including
those stemming from the forces of globalisation,
widening inequalities for women, increased
military expenditures and a religious fundamentalist
backlash.
NGOs, governments, and individuals seeking
more solid commitments from the U.N. spent
the second week of the conference pushing
forward new resolutions, numbering 10 in
all, that call for new efforts in a number
of areas.
These include HIV/AIDS, assistance for Afghan
and Palestinian women, the involvement of
indigenous women in carrying out U.N. commitments,
economic advancement for women, the creation
of a special rapporteur on laws that discriminate
against women, the elimination of the root
causes of the trafficking of women, and the
inclusion of gender perspectives in government
policies and disaster response.
Consensus was reached on eight of the resolutions
Friday. The ninth and tenth, regarding the
creation of a special rapporteur on reforming
discriminatory laws, and on economic advancement
for women, were passed by a vote, with only
the U.S. dissenting.
Many delegates at the conference focused
on positive gains and detailed the progress
that has been made over the past decade in
girl's education, the economic advancement
of women, increased political participation
and the reform of discriminatory laws in
14 countries.
”Worldwide consensus has built around the
idea that empowering women is the most effective
tool for development and poverty reduction,
and that remaining obstacles to gender equality
can be overcome,” said Rachel Mayanja, Special
Adviser to the Secretary-General on Gender
Issues and Advancement of Women.
This coming September, at the U.N. Commission
on the Status of Women, the final Declaration
will become part of the U.N.'s High-Level
Millennium Review, where further steps towards
implementation may be called for. (END/2005)
World Marks International Women's Day (AP
2005/03/09)
Leaders of the fight for women's equality
say there is no going back on the revolution
that began 30 years ago, though the challenges
ahead are immense.
The comments came at a U.N. meeting to evaluate
the world's progress toward gender equality.
Now in its second and final week, the gathering
has drawn delegates from 130 countries and
6,000 representatives from women's and human
rights organizations.
Commemorating Tuesday's International Women's
Day, Rachel Mayanja, the secretary-general's
top adviser on women, warned that "the
task ahead is not going to be any less difficult
than it has been during the past decades."
She stressed that world leaders cannot view
poverty, armed conflict and violence in isolation.
"The eradication of poverty and disease
is as important as dealing with the criminal
networks that traffic in women and children,"
she said.
Nafis Sadik, a special adviser on AIDS to
Secretary-General Kofi Annan and former head
of the U.N. Population Fund, said governments
spend more than $900 billion on the military
while the world's richest countries spend
less than $70 billion on development assistance
_ and only about $3 billion of that amount
goes to gender equality programs.
"What contributes more to security,
$3 billion invested in women or the $900
billion squandered on weapons?" Sadik
said to loud applause. "It is time for
political leaders to stop talking about peace
and really start investing in it."
At a commemoration held Friday before most
of the ministers and VIPs left, two Nobel
Peace Prize winners and the heads of the
four U.N. conferences on women since 1975
spoke of progress and challenges ahead. The
four conferences built the global women's
movement.
Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai,
last year's Nobel laureate, said women must
celebrate their achievements, including her
prize, but must fight poverty by championing
debt relief and open markets, and tackle
climate change and deforestation.
"It is us who will eventually have to
convince our governments that women need
to be given equal space, to be given an opportunity
to exploit their potential, and that it is
not a gift for women to participate in decision-making
_ it is a right," Maathai said.
Rigoberta Menchu, the Indian rights activist
from Guatemala who won the peace prize in
1992, said women should be "a beacon
of hope" to change systems promoting
racism, discrimination, exclusion and the
lack of economic opportunity.
"We women have to give the example of
being inclusive, of fighting exclusion, of
fighting racism," she said. "That
is why I'm here."
Helvi Sipila, secretary-general of the first
U.N. women's conference in Mexico City in
1975, said in a video message from her home
in Finland that women have made "considerable
strides toward gender equality" but
not enough has been done to advance peace.
"Today ... we must ask ourselves more
seriously and with greater determination
than ever what we can do in order to end
violence, to enhance national and international
understanding, and to secure world peace,"
said Sipila, 89.
Gertrude Mongella, secretary-general of the
1995 Beijing conference and now president
of the Pan-African Parliament, recalled that
in her final speech in Beijing she said:
"A revolution has begun and there's
no going back."
Ten years later, she said, women are more
visible, gender equality "has become
a working concept worldwide," and "women
and men are now mobilized to see women's
issues as societal issues, whether they like
it or not."
"We are here to set a new speed,"
Mongella said. "We are here to remove
the remaining obstacles. ... We are on the
right track of our revolution. There is no
going back."
Former U.N. assistant secretary-general Angela
King, who was Annan's top adviser on women
and organized the 2000 U.N. conference that
reviewed Beijing, said the challenges of
five years ago are the challenges of today.
She said an increasing number of women live
in poverty, lag behind in economic advancement,
are hurt by globalization, are contracting
HIV/AIDS in greater numbers and are increasingly
subject to violence in armed conflicts and
through trafficking, she said.
King noted there are only four women prime
ministers of independent countries and few
women are at peace tables, citing them as
the difficulty in changing stereotypes of
women's limited roles.
"In 1975, the Mexico conference ignited
a spark of awareness among women of their
shared hopes and common problems," King
said. "With each successive conference,
the spark grew.
"Let us pledge today as the United Nations
community, as governments, regions and individuals,
that the flame for women's freedom and equality
become a shining beacon for action to fully
realize gender equality, development and
peace."
Ambassador wrong for women's rights
BONNIE ERBE
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST (Seattle Post-Intelligencer
2005/03/09)
How embarrassing! The U.S. delegation to
a United Nations conference on women's rights
acted a bit too much like every man's nightmarish
version of a woman commandeered by a PMS
hissy fit.
These doddering dollies made us appear as
even bigger dolts than the international
community already envisions us to be. Perhaps
the delegation leader, Ambassador Ellen Sauerbrey,
figured the United States isn't yet isolated
enough. Perhaps in her view we should nuke
our borders with Mexico and Canada and sail
off as one huge cut-loose island into the
middle of the South Pacific.
I'm talking about the U.S. delegation's behavior
at the U.N. Conference on the Status of Women's
Rights (aka Beijing + 10). It began last
month in New York and runs until mid-March.
Sauerbrey is a two-time loser. Her primary
qualification for the prestigious U.N. post
is that she ran for the Maryland governorship
in 1998 and 2002 as the Republican candidate.
She made and lost a totally unnecessary and
hideously denigrating motion to roll back
women's rights, as delegates from the rest
of the globe observed with derision. This
was conservative politics at its nadir.
Let's remember: The purpose of the U.N. convocation
is to review progress for and by women made
around the world in the decade since these
same nations met in Beijing. The United Nations-sponsored
World Conference on Women in 1995 set so-called
millennium goals. The first was to cut global
poverty in half by 2015 (a goal still so
distant it's hardly recognizable).
The next was to eliminate laws that discriminate
against women (an area in which the world
has made some discernible progress the past
10 years).
The rest included universal access to primary
education for girls, promotion of gender
equality, reduction of infant mortality and
improving women's health.
But Sauerbrey paid not a whit of attention
to any of these issues and instead campaigned
for a fiasco of a U.N. declaration that there
exists no international right to abortion.
Fiasco? Yes, because no one has ever proposed
such a right under international law anyway
and, therefore, none exists. Add to that
the reality international law is something
most countries flout with impunity.
Sauerbrey steered the United States into
what she knew would be a mountain of international
resistance apparently just for fun.
Then, tail between legs and under intense
pressure from other nations and women's advocates
at home and abroad, she dropped her predictably
outrageous and superfluous demand. As one
international news agency reported, "There
appeared to be no support even for the watered-down
(version of Sauerbrey's) amendment. In one
speech after another, delegates from the
European Union, the African Union and South
America's Mercosur bloc insisted on leaving
the declaration untouched."
My question: Why did she bother? If I've
heard one conservative say it, I've heard
it billions of times: Liberal women are too
preoccupied with abortion and most people
just don't care about the issue that much.
Well, here's an example of a conservative
woman losing her sense of reason in the name
of an anti-abortion agenda. The topic simply
did not appear on the U.N. agenda, but Sauerbrey
put it there.
I can just imagine her thought process:
"Let's not worry about the fact women
still can't vote in some countries, or that
girls are denied equal educational opportunities
in many others. Let's forget, for the moment,
that African American women are the fastest-growing
group of new AIDS patients in this country
and that poor women, worldwide, have little
or no access to even primitive forms of health
care. Let's abandon the reality that 20 million
women lived below the poverty level in the
United States last year. Give up on all those
substantive issues to squabble over trying
to prove a negative."
Makes sense to me! Get centered, Ambassador
Sauerbrey. Get a life. And then go away and
get a real job.
Bonnie Erbe is a TV host and writes this
column for Scripps Howard News Service. E-mail
bonnieerbe@CompuServe.com.
Anti-torture group decries increased violence
against women (AFP 2005/03/08)
GENEVA (AFP) - The World Organisation Against
Torture has voiced its concern over the increasing
violence against women worldwide.
The worlds largest coalition of non-governmental
organisations fighting against arbitrary
detention, torture, summary and extrajudicial
executions, issued its report to coincide
with Tuesday's International Women's Day,
"Gender plays a major role on the type
of torture used, the circumstances in which
torture is used, the consequences and the
availability and access to justice,"
the group said in its report.
The anti-torture group in particular denounced
the fact that women continue to be denied
legal protection against the flaunting of
national and international rights, with the
effect of offering impunity to the transgressors.
Last year, the World Organisation Against
Torture (WOAT) denounced the rape, and other
violence against women and girls, perpetrated
in Bangladesh, Colombia, Greece, Sri Lanka,
Nepal and Sudan.
"In none of these documented cases,
were the perpetrators punished. In most of
these cases, the perpetrators were not even
arrested and in many cases no enquiry was
opened," the group said in the report.
WOAT also noted the many victims of sexual
abuse who do not report the crimes due to
shame and fear of reprisals. In some societies
the victims of sexual violence are threatened
with expulsion from their home and community,
or even risk being killed or subjected to
further violence by members of their own
family or community. Some are even forced
into marriage with the rapist.
In some countries rape victims run the risk
of being accused of adultery.
Penalties including flogging and stoning,
particularly prevalent under religious law
systems are applied in a disproportionate
manner against women, principally under laws
outlawing adultery and sexual relations outside
marriage, according to the report.
The group also denounced forms of violence
against women in the home, including domestic
violence, marital rape, honour killings,
and female genital mutilation.
The "honour" crimes often go unpunished,
the group said.
Global march for equal rights begins on Women's
day (AFP 2005/03/08)
PARIS (AFP) - Women's groups were to embark
on a global march for equal rights, International
Women's Day, amid fresh reports which paint
a fairly grim picture of their plight in
many parts of the world.
The world tour for a charter for equal rights
gets underway in Sao Paulo, Brazil and will
come to an end in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso,
in October after passing through over 50
countries in between.
The Women's Global Charter for Humanity was
adopted by women's rights groups in Kigali,
the Rwandan capital, in December.
Organisers expect 30,000 women to attend
Tuesday's start of the tour. Ouagadougou,
the Burkina Faso capital, was chosen as the
final destination because of its poverty
and low level of protection for women.
The charter proposes "to build another
world where exploitation, oppression, intolerance
and exclusion no longer exist, and where
integrity, diversity and the rights and freedoms
of all are respected."
The Montreal-based World March of Women which
authored the document "views patriarchy
as the system oppressing women and capitalism
as the system that enables a minority to
exploit the vast majority of women and men".
Some of the worst problems experienced by
women around the world were highlighted in
a new report by the World Organisation Against
Torture, published to coincide with Women's
Day.
"Gender plays a major role on the type
of torture used, the circumstances in which
torture is used, the consequences and the
availability and access to justice,"
the worlds largest coalition of non-governmental
organisations fighting against arbitrary
detention, torture, summary and extrajudicial
executions, said in its report.
The anti-torture group in particular denounced
the fact that women continue to be denied
legal protection against the flaunting of
national and international rights, with the
effect of offering impunity to the transgressors.
The World Organisation Against Torture (WOAT)
denounced the rape, and other violence against
women and girls, perpetrated in Bangladesh,
Colombia, Greece, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Sudan.
Meanwhile the UN food agency said Tuesday
it was committed to reducing additional burdens
often put on women in developing countries,
as children have a better chance of growing
up well-nourished when women are in control
of food.
"While women's access to food is all
important, it is vital that we minimize the
impact of the additional burden that this
may create," said James Morris, executive
director of the World Food Programme.
Practice had shown that ensuring women's
control over food often adds to an already
heavy burden of responsibility, the agency
said.
Women are also increasingly in the line of
fire from the multi-billion-dollar international
trade in small arms, according to a report
released on Monday by Amnesty International,
Oxfam and a third group.
In South Africa, a woman is shot dead by
a current or former partner every 18 hours,
while in the United States, two out of every
three women killed by their husbands are
shot, said the report released on the eve
of International Women's Day.
"Women are silent sufferers in the proliferation
of small arms. This is the scandal against
the human race," said Judy Bassingthwaite,
a representative of the South African-based
International Action Network on Small Arms
which also authored the report entitled:
"The Impact of Guns on Women's Lives".
In Asia, women trail well behind their male
counterparts in terms of social-economic
advancement although the gap is closing in
some countries, a regional survey released
Monday said.
The inaugural MasterIndex of Women's Advancement
measuring the social-economic success of
women in 13 regional economies, MasterCard
International said.
A score below 100 indicated gender inequality
in favor of men.
It used four key indicators -- labor force,
tertiary education, managerial positions
and median income. Of the 13 markets surveyed,
gender inequality was highest in South Korea
with a score of 45.5 followed by Indonesia
at 52.5 and Japan at 54.5.
Women in Thailand fared best with scores
of 92.3 followed by Malaysia at 86.2, China
at 68.4 and Australia at 67.6.
It's not all bad news for women, however.
A new women's political party is set to emerge
in Sweden, a country already considered a
world-leader in women's rights.
And in Kuwait on Monday the parliament agreed
to a government request to speed up moves
to look into a bill that would grant women
political rights, but did not set a date
for the proposed debate.
However the European Union voiced shock and
concern at the "disproportionate"
use of force by Turkish police to clamp down
on a demonstration in Istanbul ahead of International
Women's Day.
burs/pvh/jz
GLOBE EDITORIAL
Still unequal (Boston Globe 2005/03/08)
TEN YEARS ago in Beijing, a United Nations
summit established a set of goals for ending
discrimination against women around the world.
Among other things, that meant equality for
women in education and health care, greater
representation of women in government and
other decision-making positions, and promotion
of human rights, including an end to sex
trafficking, coerced marriage, and domestic
violence. The conference was notable for
establishing that equality for women is not
a Western construct foisted upon traditional
societies but a universal human right to
be observed by every one of the 184 governments
that signed the Beijing document.
In the 10 years since, progress has surely
been made. Life expectancy has gone up and
fertility rates have gone down. But though
governments have come to accept their obligations
toward equality for women and girls, actually
implementing these policies in the face of
entrenched customs has not been easy.
In education, for example, girls still account
for 54 percent of the 120 million children
not in school; two-thirds of the world's
illiterate are women. Yet girls who complete
secondary school are more likely to have
smaller, healthier families and to contribute
to the economic growth of their communities.
Closing the gender gap in education is not
just a matter of simple equity, in other
words, but a crucial investment in the long-term
health and development of the world.
Education must also include comprehensive
sex education. Women need information both
about family planning and protection against
sexually transmitted diseases. Some of the
highest rates of new HIV infections are among
women, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
And 500 million women still die every year
from pregnancy-related causes.
Last week the United States withdrew its
obstructionist insistence that the Beijing
agreement include a statement that it did
not create a new universal right to abortion.
The document already makes that clear. But
the US delegation at the UN's Beijing-plus-10
conference did reaffirm its commitment to
abstinence. This is not a realistic option
in the countries that are most affected by
HIV-AIDS, where thousands of young women
are coerced into sex or get HIV infections
from their husbands. Still, the Bush administration
blindly directs fully a third of the prevention
funds in its international AIDS relief initiative
toward abstinence-only education.
Women are the bellwethers of a society's
development; where women are healthy and
well-educated, families, communities, and
nations are as well. These are values worth
promoting, on International Women's Day and
every day.
Gender equality 'still a problem' (AP 2005/03/08)
STRASBOURG, France (AP) -- Male attitudes
must change for Europe to achieve gender
equality, European Parliament President Josep
Borrell said Tuesday as the legislature marked
International Women's Day.
"Equality between the sexes can't become
effective until male attitudes change radically,"
Borrell said. "Inequality of women is
not a problem of women but for women."
Borrell called on EU member states to grant
equal wages to women and arrange for "real
advantages aimed at making their lives easier."
A recent EU report found that, while gender
employment and education gaps were narrowing,
men earn on average about 15 percent more
than women across the 25-nation bloc.
"Unfortunately, pay inequality is a
reality, and the Commission will recommend
to the member states to work harder on eradicating
that gap," Employment and Social Affairs
Commissioner Vladimir Spidla told the legislature.
The European Parliament devoted parts of
Tuesday's session to marking the 10th anniversary
of the United Nations' fourth World Conference
on Women in Beijing, during which a blueprint
to achieve equality between the sexes was
adopted by 189 nations.
A seminar on combating violence against women
featuring female rights activists, including
Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali, an advocate
for Muslim immigrant women's rights, was
scheduled for later in the day.
One of five women in the EU claims to be
abused, and Borrell called on EU member states
to introduce harsher penalties for crimes
against women.
"Every day, thousands of women are victims
of discrimination on grounds of gender,"
Borrell said. "They still suffer from
psychological, physical and economic violence."
Borrell joined calls for establishing a Europe-wide
gender institute dealing with women's issues
and reiterated the Parliament's resolve to
focus on safeguarding the equality between
the sexes on all levels.
Socialist MEP Lissy Groener called on EU
member states to introduce quotas to ensure
women become more involved in decision-making
processes, a call echoed by other women's
rights activists in the Parliament.
World Marks International Women's Day
By EDITH M. LEDERER (AP 2005/03/08)
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Leaders of the fight
for women's equality say there is no going
back on the revolution that began 30 years
ago though the challenges ahead are immense.
The comments came at a U.N. meeting to evaluate
the world's progress toward gender equality.
Now in its second and final week, the gathering
has drawn delegates from 130 countries and
6,000 representatives from women's and human
rights organizations.
On Tuesday, they will observe International
Women's Day with a panel discussion on gender
equality beyond 2005.
But there was an early commemoration on Friday,
before most of the ministers and VIPs left,
that included two Nobel Peace Prize winners
and the heads of the four U.N. conferences
since 1975 that built the global women's
movement.
Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai,
who was last year's Nobel laureate, said
women must celebrate their achievements but
there is still much to do. She urged women
to fight poverty by championing debt relief
and open markets, and to tackle climate change
and deforestation, she said.
``It is us who will eventually have to convince
our governments that women need to be given
equal space, to be given an opportunity to
exploit their potential, and that it is not
a gift for women to participate in decision-making
- it is a right,'' Maathai said to loud applause.
Rigoberta Menchu, the Indian rights activist
from Guatemala who won the Peace Prize in
1992, said women should be ``a beacon of
hope'' to those fighting racism, discrimination,
exclusion, and the lack of economic opportunity.
``We women have to give the example of being
inclusive, of fighting exclusion, of fighting
racism,'' she said. ``That is why I'm here.''
Helvi Sipila, secretary-general of the first
U.N. women's conference in Mexico City in
1975, said in a video message from her home
in Finland that women have made ``considerable
strides towards gender equality,'' and ``every
day is an opportunity for actions, not just
words.''
``We must ask ourselves more seriously and
with greater determination than ever what
we can do in order to end violence, to enhance
national and international understanding,
and to secure world peace,'' said Sipila,
89.
Gertrude Mongella, secretary-general of the
Beijing conference and now president of the
Pan-African Parliament, recalled that in
her final speech in at the 1995 Beijing conference
she said: ``A revolution has begun and there's
no going back.''
Ten years later, she said, women are more
visible, gender equality ``has become a working
concept worldwide,'' and ``women and men
are now mobilized to see women's issues as
societal issues, whether they like it or
not.''
Former U.N. assistant secretary-general Angela
King, who was Secretary-General Kofi Annan's
top adviser on women and organized the 2000
U.N. women's conference, said the challenges
of five years ago are the challenges of today.
A growing number of women live in poverty,
women are lagging behind in economic advancement,
globalization is hurting many women, the
incidence of HIV/AIDS is rising among young
women and violence against women is increasing
in armed conflict, at home and through trafficking,
she said.
King said progress is slow for a host of
reasons - no budgets for gender programs,
only four female prime ministers of independent
countries and the difficulty in changing
stereotypes of women's limited roles.
``In 1975, the Mexico conference ignited
a spark of awareness among women of their
shared hopes and common problems,'' King
said. ``With each successive conference,
the spark grew until it became a living flame
in Beijing.''
``Let us pledge today as the United Nations
community, as governments, regions and individuals,
that the flame for women's freedom and equality
become a shining beacon for action to fully
realize gender equality, development and
peace,'' she said.
Women worldwide face effects of Bush's gag
rule
- Dian Harrison (San Francisco Chronicle
2005/03/07)
Tuesday is International Women's Day, a worldwide
celebration of women's fight for equality
and human rights. In light of this commemoration,
it is especially disappointing that the Bush
administration is working so hard to restrict
women's rights.
Ten years ago, a landmark U.N. conference
in Beijing adopted a platform seeking to
establish global equality for women. Along
with recommendations on issues such as domestic
violence and education, the platform states
women should be able to "decide freely
and responsibly on matters related to their
sexuality ... free of coercion, discrimination
and violence." It also asserts that
abortion should be safe in places where it
is legal and criminal charges should not
be filed against women who undergo illegal
abortion.
On Feb. 28, more than 100 countries and 6,000
advocates for women came together for a follow-up
meeting to that conference. At the meeting,
participants had planned to review progress
made on women's rights. They had hoped to
focus on pressing issues like political participation,
sex trafficking and HIV/AIDS. Instead, they
have been focused on the Bush administration's
attempts to derail progress toward gender
equality.
A week before the conference, the U.N. Commission
on the Status of Women asked participating
countries to reaffirm their commitment to
the original conference platform. In a nod
to their conservative base, representatives
from the Bush administration in the U.S.
delegation said the United States would not
sign on because they don't believe women
should be guaranteed the right to abortion.
This is despite the fact that the platform
does not guarantee abortion rights.
The U.S. delegation was also concerned that
the ability to "decide freely and responsibly
on matters related to their sexuality ...
free of coercion, discrimination and violence"
constitutes "sexual rights" for
women, which according to the chief of the
delegation, "not all member states accept."
Additionally, Bush administration representatives
demanded an amendment stating that a commitment
to "reproductive health services"
does not guarantee abortion rights. Egypt
and Qatar were the only countries that have
indicated support for the amendment. Only
after intense pressure from other member
countries did the United States withdraw
the demand for an amendment.
Now, member states wish to move forward to
address the fact that 10 years after the
original conference, women are still second-class
citizens in much of the world.
Ethiopia is a perfect example. Women have
few rights. Laws and traditions prevent them
from owning property, so they remain dependent
on husbands and sons. In some instances,
girls as young as 9 are married off to older
men. According to the United Nations' WomenWatch,
most Ethiopian women have their first child
by 17 and are prevented from pursuing an
education. Seventy-five percent are illiterate.
Only 8 percent of women in Ethiopia have
access to contraception, according to Population
Action International. They have little or
no control over when or whether they will
have sex and repeatedly face unplanned pregnancies.
They bear, on average, seven children. The
maternal mortality rate is among the worst
in the world. Rates of sexually transmitted
infections are extremely high. The World
Bank reports that more than 2 million Ethiopian
women have HIV/AIDS.
Those rates are worsening because of the
Bush administration's position on women.
In 2001, President Bush reinstated the global
gag rule restricting funding for family planning.
Under the gag rule, family planning agencies
that receive U.S. money may not offer abortion
counsel or refer women to abortion providers,
or lobby to make or keep abortion legal in
their own country, even if they use separate
funds not provided by the United States.
Providers are forced to make a cruel choice:
Give up vital assistance and try to afford
to continue to counsel women on all pregnancy
options, or withhold critically important
information.
The gag rule restricts the simplest ways
to improve the status of women: funding birth-control
supplies so they can avoid unintended pregnancies
and care for children they already have.
In Ethiopia, abortion is illegal. Because
most nongovernmental organizations that provide
family planning have refused to abide by
the gag rule, the resulting lack of U.S.
funds has restricted the contraceptive supply,
which means that abortion is also very common.
Women take their lives into their own hands
when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. If
they cannot adequately care for another child,
they try to end pregnancies with herbs, poisons
or wire. Complications from unsafe abortions
are the second leading cause of death for
women, after tuberculosis, in Ethiopia.
As long as the Bush administration restricts
women's rights by blocking access to contraception
with the gag rule, unintended pregnancies
will occur. So will abortion. The Bush administration's
global gag rule and political posturing last
week only exacerbate the situation. Women
in all countries should have the right to
make responsible decisions without coercion,
discrimination or violence. They should have
access to comprehensive information and health
care. They should be able to own property,
pursue an education, decide who and when
to marry, and whether and when to have children.
The situation in Ethiopia, however, is endemic
around the world. Traditions and laws inextricably
link sexual rights to education, employment,
property rights and political participation.
The rights the U.S. delegation was lobbying
against last week are the very rights that
would improve the status of women and their
children. Rather than taking into account
the harsh realities of women's lives and
working to provide real solutions for women
and girls, the Bush administration is playing
politics with women's lives.
Dian Harrison is president and CEO of Planned
Parenthood Golden Gate (www.ppgg.org), which has a family-planning partnership
with the Ethiopian Evangelical Church Mekane
Yesus. Together, the organizations provide
health education, birth control and safe-pregnancy
care to 3.5 million in the South-Central
region of Ethiopia.
ヒラリー議員が中絶巡り発言「各国、権利の推進者に」
(読売 2005/03/07)
【ニューヨーク=月野美帆子】ヒラリー・クリントン米上院議員は6日(日本時間7日)、ニューヨーク市内で開かれた民間活動団体主催の女性と人権に関するシンポジウムで演説し、現在開会中の国連の「婦人の地位委員会」閣僚級会合で論争になっている「中絶の権利」について言及した。
ヒラリー議員は「女性の健康や家族計画に関する情報・サービスを制限することは、望まない妊娠や中絶を減らすことにならない」と述べた。さらに「各国政府や指導者は、こうした女性の権利の推進者にならなければならない」と語った。
US drops call for abortion clause
By Mark Turner (Financial Times 2005/03/07)
The US abandoned its demand that a United
Nations declaration reaffirming efforts to
achieve women's equality include language
stressing that the 1995 Beijing women's conference
did not create new human rights, including
the right to abortion.
Ellen Sauerbrey, the US delegation head,
withdrew the amendment amid global opposition,
but claimed Washington's effort had been
successful in clarifying the situation.
"Our goals in coming here with the amendment
were to clarify language that has been troublesome.
While we don't have an amendment to the declaration
itself, that was far less important to us
than ending this week with a clear understanding
by states that this is not a binding document,"
she said.
"It has broad policy goals that we support,
but it does not create any new international
human rights, including a human right to
abortion." Mark Turner, United Nations
Editorial: Bush's abortion misstep (New York
Times 2005/03/07)
At a moment when the United States should
be leading the world on advancing women's
equality, the Bush administration chose instead
to alienate government ministers and 6,000
other delegates at an important United Nations
conference on that issue last week with a
burst of antiabortion zealotry.
The two-week session is being held to reinvigorate
efforts to improve women's lives a decade
after a landmark UN conference in Beijing.
The organizers had hoped to keep a tight
focus on urgent challenges like sexual trafficking,
educational inequities and the spread of
AIDS.
The first order of business was to be quick
approval of a simple statement reaffirming
the Beijing meeting's closing declaration.
But on Monday, the Americans created turmoil
by announcing that the United States would
not join an otherwise universal consensus
unless the document was amended to say that
it did not create "any new international
human rights" or "include the right
to abortion."
This was shabby and mischievous. For one
thing, the Beijing statement was nonbinding.
For another, the Beijing negotiators had
tried to anticipate controversy by recognizing
unsafe abortions as a serious public health
issue while leaving the question of legality
up to each nation.
Specifically, the platform established at
the Beijing meeting says that abortion should
be safe where it is legal, and that criminal
action should not be taken against any woman
who has an abortion. All of this seemed clear
enough, but the Bush team apparently could
not resist an opportunity to press its antiabortion
agenda.
By Thursday evening, the American delegation
had agreed to drop the explicit antiabortion
clause from its proposed amendment, and on
Friday it finally withdrew the amendment
entirely. But the damage had been done.
An apology is due from the United States
delegation for the weeklong disruption it
caused. So is a fresh spirit of cooperation
and a less rigid insistence on dictating
global strategy.
WOMEN'S DAY
Suu Kyi gets award for battling for democracy
(Bangkok Post 2005/03/07)
The United Nations Gender and Religious department
will today mark International Women's Day
by presenting an award to Burmese opposition
leader and democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi
for her tireless struggle for democracy in
her homeland, according to the exiled National
Council of the Union of Burma (NCUB).
The award will be presented to San San, an
elected member of parliament in exile of
the National League for Democracy (NLD),
by Swiss ambassador Hans-Peter Erismann,
NCUB secretary-general Maung Maung said.
Now 74 years old, San San left Burma on May
30, 2003, when the junta clashed with Mrs
Suu Kyi and members of the NLD during a campaign
in northern Burma. Jailed twice in Rangoon,
she is now secretary of the Members of Parliament
Union and a senior NCUB member. Ms Suu Kyi
has been under house arrest since May 2003
despite international calls for her unconditional
release.
Hillary Rodham Clinton criticizes Bush abortion
stance (AP 2005/03/06)
NEW YORK -- The Bush administration's policy
of withholding aid from overseas groups that
perform abortions is hurting women and forcing
clinics to close, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton
said Sunday.
Clinton, speaking at a New York University
forum to mark the 10th anniversary of the
United Nations' fourth World Conference on
Women in Beijing, said 20 million women worldwide
risk unsafe abortions every year, 68,000
die and many more are injured.
"Many of these deaths and these injuries
can be prevented by providing women with
the information and means to choose the size
and spacing of their own families, and yet
I regret that the government of my own country
is making it more difficult for women in
these situations to receive safe medical
care," said Clinton, D-N.Y. "It
is unfair for governments and people in developed
countries who have access to the full range
of reproductive and family health services
to deny those to women in other countries
around the world."
Under the so-called global gag rule, which
President Bush reinstituted when he took
office, overseas non-governmental organizations
that perform abortions or advocate the legalization
of abortion are ineligible for U.S government
money.
At a U.N. meeting last week marking the anniversary
of the Beijing conference, the United States
joined nations around the world in reaffirming
a blueprint to achieve equality for women
after backing down on a proposed anti-abortion
amendment.
U.S. Ambassador Ellen Sauerbrey said Washington
abandoned the effort after receiving assurances
the goals adopted at the 1995 conference
did not create a new global right to abortion.
Bush opposes abortion except in cases of
rape or incest or when pregnancy endangers
a woman's life.
UN women's rights text adopted after US withdraws
proposed amendment on abortion (UN News Centre
2005/03/05)
5 March 2005 -- A United Nations women's
rights committee has adopted a declaration
reaffirming priorities set ten years ago
at an international conference in Beijing
after the United States delegation withdrew
a proposed amendment to the text.
The announcement by Washington at Friday
morning's meeting of the Commission on the
Status of Women drew applause from delegates
in the crowded conference room.
The declaration, adopted at the afternoon
session, reaffirmed the relevance of the
Beijing Platform for Action, a wide-ranging
blueprint for promoting and protecting the
rights of women and girls.
Although that action plan contains only one
reference to abortion, the issue was contentious
enough to prompt the proposed amendment by
the United States, whose delegate said she
accepted the declaration reaffirming the
Beijing document only on the understanding
that neither was legally binding. She stressed
that the United States did not recognize
abortion as a method of family planning,
and did not support abortion in its reproductive
health assistance.
The declaration called on the international
community to intensify contributions aimed
at implementing the Beijing plan as well
as a five-year review document adopted by
the General Assembly in 2000.
While numerous speakers took the floor to
debate the abortion question during the session,
others said that issue was overshadowing
more pressing concerns faced by the world's
women, who too often find themselves trapped
in poverty or falling victim to violence.
New Zealand's representative, speaking also
for Canada and Australia, said the Commission
had spent too much time debating shades of
meaning when the international community
needed to focus its energy on tackling real
challenges.
The Platform for Action addresses 12 critical
areas of concern: poverty, education, health,
violence, armed and other conflicts, economic
participation, power-sharing and decision-making,
national and international machineries, human
rights, mass media, environment and development,
and the needs of girls.
In 1995, after the action plan was adopted,
a representative of the United States called
it “the strongest policy statement promoting
women's empowerment ever made by the international
community."
At Friday's session of the Commission, delegates
also commemorated International Women's Day,
traditionally observed on 8 March.
Among the high-level participants were two
Nobel Peace Prize Laureates: Rigoberta Menchu
Tum of Guatemala, who said women must go
way beyond legal challenges to implement
international principles on their rights,
and Wangari Maathai of Kenya, who said she
symbolized the efforts of all women to promote
gender equality.
「北京綱領」を再確認
国連女性地位委 政治宣言を採択
米、修正案取り下げ (朝日 2005/03/05夕刊)
【ニューヨーク=竹信三恵子】米ニューヨークの国連本部で「北京+10会議」として開かれている第49回女性の地位委員会(CSW)は4日、95年の第4回国連世界女性会議で採択された「北京行動綱領」を再確認する内容の政治宣言を原案通り採択した。「中絶の権利が含まれないことの再確認」を挿入する修正案を出していた米国政府は、採択の期限とされていた同日、取り下げた。
宣言には、男女平等を世界各国で実現するための包括的な対策をまとめた「北京行動綱領」と00年の国連特別総会「2000年女性会議」の成果文書の再確認などが盛りこまれた。
これらが中絶を「リプロダクティブ・ヘルス/ライツ(性と生殖についての健康と権利)」にかかわるものとし、違法中絶などの危険な中絶などは女性の健康を損なうと位置づけていることに対し、米国政府は、中絶の権利などの拡大に利用されると反対。宣言に「いかなる新しい国際的人権も創設しないこと、中絶の権利を含まないことを再確認する」との文言を挿入するよう要求していた。
だが、バチカンを除き、参加各国が反発。会議は紛糾し、投票に持ち込まれる懸念も出ていたが、米国は、綱領などでいう人権には中絶の権利は含まれないものと解釈する、として、修正案を取り下げた。
会議は今後、津波対策や女性の経済的地位向上などをテーマとした決議を採択、11日に閉会する。
Women Reaffirm U.N. Equality Blueprint
By EDITH M. LEDERER (AP 2005/03/05)
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States joined
nations around the world in reaffirming a
U.N. blueprint to achieve equality for women,
though the counties refused to go along with
Washington's proposed anti-abortion amendment,
saying it was a distraction from real issues.
U.S. Ambassador Ellen Sauerbrey said Washington
abandoned the effort after receiving assurances
the goals adopted at a 1995 U.N. conference
in Beijing did not create a new global right
to abortion.
``We have heard from countries that our interpretation
is their interpretation,'' Sauerbrey told
reporters. ``So the amendment, we recognize,
is really redundant, but it has accomplished
its goals.''
The proposed amendment angered many of the
governments and advocates at this week's
meeting marking the 10th anniversary of the
Beijing conference. They had hoped to focus
on economic, political and educational obstacles
to women's equality - not on abortion.
Some 6,000 representatives of women's and
human rights organizations are participating
in the gathering, which continues next week.
Hours after the United States backed down,
the 45-member U.N. Commission on the Status
of Women unanimously adopted the declaration
with U.S. support. Commission chair Kyung-wha
Kang said she was particularly grateful to
the United States for joining consensus in
``the spirit of cooperation.''
In the one-page declaration, nations reaffirm
the Beijing platform and a declaration adopted
with it, welcome progress toward achieving
gender equality, stress that challenges remain,
and ``pledge to undertake further action
to ensure their full and accelerated implementation.''
Sauerbrey said the United States sought to
amend the declaration because of concerns
that advocacy groups were attempting to hijack
the term ``reproductive health services''
and define it in a way that guarantees the
right to abortion.
In a speech after the vote, she reiterated
that U.S. consultations with other countries
had reaffirmed that the Beijing documents
do not endorse abortion in any way.
Sauerbrey said the United States also ``understands
that there is international consensus that
the terms 'reproductive health services'
and 'reproductive rights' do not include
abortion or constitute support, endorsement,
or promotion of abortion.''
There were jeers and cheers from some activists
when Sauerbrey emphasized the U.S. promotion
of abstinence for adolescents, and its ABC
approach to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS
- abstinence, be faithful, and consistent
condom use.
In arguing for the amendment, the United
States found itself virtually alone. Nations
from Africa, Europe, Latin America and Asia
all opposed opening up the document drafted
by the commission, which organized the meeting.
The Vatican, which has observer status at
the United Nations, strongly backed the U.S.
amendments. Like Sauerbrey, its representative
was both cheered and booed by representatives
of some advocacy organizations when she said
the Holy See would have preferred that the
declaration state clearly that Beijing ``did
not create new human rights, including the
right to abortion.''
Charlotte Bunch, executive director of the
Center for Women's Global Leadership, said
the U.S. amendment was unnecessary, a distraction
from the real issues, and ``an effort to
inject U.S. politics into a broad international
consensus.''
``They are declaring victory and going home,
as in Vietnam,'' she said. ``The reality
is that they heard loud and clear the voices
of 6,000 women here saying `No,' echoing
millions of other women worldwide.''
Adrienne Germain, president of the International
Women's Health Coalition, expressed hope
that the United States ``will continue in
a spirit of consensus-building'' next week
when other contentious issues come up. These
include proposed U.S. resolutions on economic
advancement for women and trafficking, which
would urge governments to criminalize prostitution,
she said.
国連女性会議:米国妥協し、政治宣言採択 (毎日
2005/03/05)
【ニューヨーク國枝すみれ】ニューヨークの国連本部で開かれている「国連婦人の地位向上委員会」は4日、95年の北京会議で決めた北京行動綱領の内容を再確認し、実行推進を求める政治宣言を採択した。米ブッシュ政権は北京綱領が「妊娠中絶を容認するもの」と批判し、修正要求していたが、各国の反発を受けて妥協。原案通りの採択となった。
しかし、米国代表は採択後も「北京綱領が中絶の権利など新しい人権を認めるものでなく、性と生殖に関する女性の決定権に中絶は含まれない、という国際理解ができたと考える。この発言を記録に留めて欲しい」と発言し、最後まで自論を展開した。
北京行動綱領を再確認 国連女性委が政治宣言
(共同 2005/03/05)
女性の地位向上を目指しニューヨークの国連本部で開会中の「女性の地位委員会」閣僚級会合は4日、女性の人権保護促進などをうたった1995年の「北京行動綱領」を国際的な基準として再確認するとの政治宣言を採択した。
会合では、中絶禁止問題をめぐり、宣言に盛り込みたい米国と、出産するかどうかを女性が判断すべきだとして反対する国や団体が鋭く対立したが、米側が主張を取り下げ、北京行動綱領に修正を加えないことで採択への合意が成立した。会合は11日まで続く。
宣言は「行動綱領の全面的で効果的な履行が、2000年の国連総会で採択された『ミレニアム宣言』の開発目標達成に不可欠」と強調。同宣言の達成状況を見直す「今年9月の国連特別首脳会合でも(行動綱領を)確認する必要性を訴える」とした。
行動綱領は(1)伝統や宗教を口実にした暴力や人身売買を防止する法律制定(2)女性の地位向上に関する責任を政府の高いレベルに負わせる(3)女性の人権を保護し促進するための国内機関の創設−などが柱。
「もったいない」世界に響け ノーベル賞マータイさん 国連で日本語紹介
(産経 2005/03/05)
【ニューヨーク=長戸雅子】女性の地位向上などについて討議している国連の「女性の地位委員会」閣僚級会合で四日、ノーベル平和賞受賞者でケニア環境副大臣のワンガリ・マータイさんが演説し、日本語の「もったいない」を環境保護の合言葉として紹介し、会議の参加者とともに唱和した。
マータイさんは二月に来日した際、「もったいない」という言葉を知って感銘を受け、世界に広めることを決意したという。
この日の演説では「『もったいない』は消費削減(リデュース)、再使用(リユース)、資源再利用(リサイクル)、修理(リペア)の四つの『R』を表している」と解説、「MOTTAINAI」と書かれたTシャツを手に「さあ、みんなで『もったいない』を言いましょう」と呼びかけ、会場を埋めた政府代表者や非政府組織(NGO)の参加者とともに唱和した。さらにマータイさんは「限りある資源を有効に使い、みなで公平に分担すべきだ。そうすれば、資源をめぐる争いである戦争は起きない」と主張した。
北京綱領後退せず…婦人の地位委員会が政治宣言採択
(読売 2005/03/05)
【ニューヨーク=月野美帆子】ニューヨークの国連本部で開かれている「婦人の地位委員会」閣僚級会合は4日午後(日本時間5日)、1995年の北京会議で決めた北京行動綱領の内容を再確認し、実行を推進する「政治宣言」を採択した。女性の人権を前面に打ち出し世界の女性政策の指針となった北京行動綱領からの後退を許さないとする各国と、女性の中絶の権利を認めない立場の米国政府との間で対立が続いていたが、北京行動綱領は後退することなく再確認された。
政治宣言は、「男女が対等な立場で協力できる社会づくりを今後一層推進するため、国連、各国政府、NGOが全力を尽くす」などとしている。
政治宣言案をめぐっては、米国政府が「(北京行動綱領は)中絶の権利を認めるものではない」との内容を盛り込むことを要求。これに対しルクセンブルク、フランスなど欧州連合(EU)諸国などは「北京行動綱領を支持する」との立場を相次いで表明した。
日本政府代表団首席代表の西銘順志郎・内閣府大臣政務官も「北京行動綱領のさらなる実施に向けて行動とイニシアチブを明確にする」と表明している。
各国政府代表による調整が直前まで続けられた結果、米国政府が4日までに要求を取り下げた。
会期後半では、人身売買や女性の経済的地位向上についての問題など重要テーマについて個別に協議し、最終日の11日に問題解決への戦略を盛り込んだ「決議」としてまとめる。
◆国連婦人の地位委員会=国連が女性の地位向上に取り組む上で中核的な役割を果たしている委員会。1946年、国連の1組織として設置された。政治、社会、教育などにおける女性の地位向上について、経済社会理事会に対して勧告や報告、提案などを行う。
国連で「もったいない」唱和=ノーベル賞のマータイさん
(時事 2005/03/05)
【ニューヨーク4日時事】「さあ、皆さんもご一緒に。もったいない!」−。ノーベル平和賞受賞者のワンガリ・マータイさんは4日、女性の地位向上を討議する国連の「女性の地位委員会」で演説し、環境保護の合言葉として日本語の「もったいない」を紹介、会場の参加者と唱和し、笑いと拍手を誘った。
マータイさんは、「もったいない」とは、消費削減(リデュース)、物資の再使用(リユース)、資源再利用(リサイクル)、修理(リペア)の「4つのR」を実践することだと説明。一人ひとりの身近な努力を訴えた。
マータイさんは先の来日の際、「もったいない」という言葉に感銘を受け、世界に広げると約束していた。
マータイさん:国連女性会議で「もったいない」を奨励
(毎日 2005/03/05)
(写真) 「もったいない」とTシャツを掲げるマータイさん=ニューヨーク国連本部で4日、本田理写す
【ニューヨーク足立旬子、國枝すみれ】環境分野で初のノーベル平和賞を受賞したケニア副環境相、ワンガリ・マータイさん(64)が4日、ニューヨークの国連本部で開かれている「国連婦人の地位向上委員会」で演説した。毎日新聞社の招きで2月に来日した際に日本語の「もったいない」という言葉を知ったと話し、これをキーワードに「女性たちによる世界的『もったいない』キャンペーンを展開し、資源を効率良く利用しましょう」と訴えた。
紫色の民族衣装で登場したマータイさんは、ノーベル平和賞受賞について「私たち女性全員に贈られたものだと考えている」とした後、日本政府がリデュース(ごみの減量)▽リユース(再使用)▽リサイクル(再利用)の3R運動に取り組んでいることを紹介。ローマ字で「MOTTAINAI」と書かれたTシャツを手に、「日本ではこれらを『もったいない』の一言で表します」と説明した。
マータイさんは日本から帰国後に、ケニア・ナイロビに本部を置く国連環境計画(UNEP)のテプファー事務局長と会談し、3Rにリペア(修繕する)を加えた4Rを「もったいない」運動としてはどうかと言われたという。演説でも「4R運動で持続可能な開発を実現し、限りある資源を有効利用し、公平に分配すれば、資源をめぐる紛争は起きない」と訴えた。
マータイさんが「みんなで『もったいない』と言いましょう」と呼びかけると、各地から参加している政府の代表やNGO(非政府組織)の女